↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Approaches for discontinuation versus continuation of long-term antidepressant use for depressive and anxiety disorders in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
289 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
Title
Approaches for discontinuation versus continuation of long-term antidepressant use for depressive and anxiety disorders in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013495.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ellen Van Leeuwen, Mieke L van Driel, Mark A Horowitz, Tony Kendrick, Maria Donald, An IM De Sutter, Lindsay Robertson, Thierry Christiaens

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 289 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 180 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Master 19 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Other 10 6%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 72 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 17%
Psychology 20 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 9%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 85 47%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 332. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2022.
All research outputs
#80,560
of 22,608,005 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#147
of 12,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,436
of 337,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,608,005 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.