↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Approaches for discontinuation versus continuation of long-term antidepressant use for depressive and anxiety disorders in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
292 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Approaches for discontinuation versus continuation of long-term antidepressant use for depressive and anxiety disorders in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013495.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ellen Van Leeuwen, Mieke L van Driel, Mark A Horowitz, Tony Kendrick, Maria Donald, An IM De Sutter, Lindsay Robertson, Thierry Christiaens

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 292 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 25%
Student > Master 7 18%
Researcher 5 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 15%
Psychology 4 10%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 9 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 339. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2021.
All research outputs
#55,566
of 18,339,396 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#107
of 11,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,949
of 327,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,339,396 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.