↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Approaches for discontinuation versus continuation of long‐term antidepressant use for depressive and anxiety disorders in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
268 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
299 Mendeley
Title
Approaches for discontinuation versus continuation of long‐term antidepressant use for depressive and anxiety disorders in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013495.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ellen Van Leeuwen, Mieke L van Driel, Mark A Horowitz, Tony Kendrick, Maria Donald, An Im De Sutter, Lindsay Robertson, Thierry Christiaens

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 268 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 299 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 299 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 10%
Student > Bachelor 28 9%
Researcher 25 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 7%
Other 16 5%
Other 44 15%
Unknown 135 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 9%
Psychology 27 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Unspecified 6 2%
Other 29 10%
Unknown 148 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 339. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#100,417
of 25,996,988 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#185
of 13,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,105
of 456,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,996,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.