↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Approaches for discontinuation versus continuation of long‐term antidepressant use for depressive and anxiety disorders in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
270 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
311 Mendeley
Title
Approaches for discontinuation versus continuation of long‐term antidepressant use for depressive and anxiety disorders in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013495.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ellen Van Leeuwen, Mieke L van Driel, Mark A Horowitz, Tony Kendrick, Maria Donald, An Im De Sutter, Lindsay Robertson, Thierry Christiaens

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 270 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 311 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 311 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 10%
Student > Bachelor 27 9%
Researcher 25 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 7%
Other 16 5%
Other 48 15%
Unknown 144 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 17%
Psychology 28 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Unspecified 7 2%
Other 29 9%
Unknown 159 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 339. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2024.
All research outputs
#102,349
of 26,371,446 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#191
of 13,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,126
of 458,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,371,446 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.