↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
271 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010176.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Momen A Atieh, Nabeel Hm Alsabeeha, Alan Gt Payne, Sara Ali, Clovis M Jr Faggion, Marco Esposito

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 271 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 6%
Student > Bachelor 16 6%
Student > Postgraduate 15 6%
Other 15 6%
Other 58 21%
Unknown 116 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 32%
Unspecified 14 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 2%
Engineering 4 1%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 134 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,754,557
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,739
of 11,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,033
of 453,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#59
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.