↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
9 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010176.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Momen A Atieh, Nabeel HM Alsabeeha, Alan GT Payne, Sara Ali, Clovis M Jr Faggion, Marco Esposito

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 158 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Unspecified 11 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 37 23%
Unknown 54 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 34%
Unspecified 12 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 65 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,408,236
of 21,763,118 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,301
of 12,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,092
of 339,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,763,118 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.