The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Endoluminal interventions versus surgical interventions for stenosis in vein grafts following infrainguinal bypass
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013702.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francesco E Botelho, Daniel G Cacione, Jose Oyama Leite, Jose Cc Baptista-Silva |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 32 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 34 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2021.
All research outputs
#5,405,461
of 26,245,314 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,484
of 13,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,323
of 458,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#108
of 165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,245,314 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.