↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Rapid versus standard antimicrobial susceptibility testing to guide treatment of bloodstream infection

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Rapid versus standard antimicrobial susceptibility testing to guide treatment of bloodstream infection
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013235.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanesa Anton-Vazquez, Paul Hine, Sanjeev Krishna, Marty Chaplin, Timothy Planche

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Other 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 20 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 22 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,817,635
of 21,656,912 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,126
of 12,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,678
of 341,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,656,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,098 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.