↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Rapid versus standard antimicrobial susceptibility testing to guide treatment of bloodstream infection

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
12 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Rapid versus standard antimicrobial susceptibility testing to guide treatment of bloodstream infection
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013235.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanesa Anton-Vazquez, Paul Hine, Sanjeev Krishna, Marty Chaplin, Timothy Planche

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 94 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 10%
Researcher 8 9%
Unspecified 7 7%
Other 6 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 45 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 15%
Unspecified 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 50 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,269,293
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,675
of 11,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,324
of 454,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#68
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.