↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Alternative reactive support surfaces (non-foam and non-air-filled) for preventing pressure ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
18 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Alternative reactive support surfaces (non-foam and non-air-filled) for preventing pressure ulcers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013623.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chunhu Shi, Jo C Dumville, Nicky Cullum, Sarah Rhodes, Elizabeth McInnes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Unspecified 11 10%
Student > Master 10 10%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 41 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 13%
Unspecified 11 10%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 46 44%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,911,565
of 23,517,535 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,272
of 12,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,535
of 440,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#63
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,517,535 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.