↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Alternative reactive support surfaces (non‐foam and non‐air‐filled) for preventing pressure ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
Title
Alternative reactive support surfaces (non‐foam and non‐air‐filled) for preventing pressure ulcers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013623.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chunhu Shi, Jo C Dumville, Nicky Cullum, Sarah Rhodes, Elizabeth McInnes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 147 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Master 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 75 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Unspecified 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 81 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,237,118
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,609
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,907
of 456,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.