↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non-drug therapies for the secondary prevention of lower limb muscle cramps

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Non-drug therapies for the secondary prevention of lower limb muscle cramps
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008496.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona Hawke, Sean G Sadler, Hans Dieter Katzberg, Fereshteh Pourkazemi, Vivienne Chuter, Joshua Burns

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Master 9 8%
Other 8 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Lecturer 4 4%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 53 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 13%
Sports and Recreations 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 58 53%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2022.
All research outputs
#3,138,385
of 22,609,602 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,814
of 12,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,817
of 349,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,609,602 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.