| Title |
Fludrocortisone for orthostatic hypotension
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012868.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephanie Veazie, Kim Peterson, Yasmin Ansari, Kathryn A Chung, Christopher H. Gibbons, Satish R Raj, Mark Helfand |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 12% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Egypt | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 19% |
| Scientists | 3 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 136 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 69 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 77 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,960,292
of 24,576,899 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,275
of 12,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,251
of 435,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,576,899 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.