↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for preventing nausea and vomiting in women undergoing regional anaesthesia for caesarean section

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
29 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for preventing nausea and vomiting in women undergoing regional anaesthesia for caesarean section
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007579.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

James D Griffiths, Gillian Ml Gyte, Phil A Popham, Kacey Williams, Shantini Paranjothy, Hannah K Broughton, Heather C Brown, Jane Thomas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 144 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Student > Master 12 8%
Other 10 7%
Researcher 6 4%
Student > Postgraduate 5 3%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 80 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Psychology 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 84 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,718,499
of 26,245,314 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,507
of 13,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,233
of 461,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,245,314 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.