| Title |
Interventions for promoting physical activity in people with neuromuscular disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013544.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katherine Jones, Fiona Hawke, Jane Newman, James AL Miller, Joshua Burns, Djordje G Jakovljevic, Grainne Gorman, Douglass M Turnbull, Gita Ramdharry |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 28% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| India | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 29 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 46 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 12% |
| Scientists | 4 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 271 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 6% |
| Researcher | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 10% |
| Unknown | 154 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 12 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 3% |
| Psychology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 7% |
| Unknown | 163 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2022.
All research outputs
#976,644
of 24,520,935 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,018
of 12,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,008
of 437,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,935 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.