| Title |
New generation antidepressants for depression in children and adolescents: a network meta‐analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013674.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah E Hetrick, Joanne E McKenzie, Alan P Bailey, Vartika Sharma, Carl I Moller, Paul B Badcock, Georgina R Cox, Sally N Merry, Nicholas Meader |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 275 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 47 | 17% |
| United States | 23 | 8% |
| Canada | 10 | 4% |
| Australia | 8 | 3% |
| Germany | 7 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 5 | 2% |
| Japan | 4 | 1% |
| France | 4 | 1% |
| Mexico | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 29 | 11% |
| Unknown | 134 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 189 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 40 | 15% |
| Scientists | 38 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 345 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 345 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 44 | 13% |
| Unknown | 194 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 14% |
| Psychology | 20 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 40 | 12% |
| Unknown | 203 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 290. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2024.
All research outputs
#123,341
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#225
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,692
of 461,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.