↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Taxation of sugar-sweetened beverages for reducing their consumption and preventing obesity or other adverse health outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
Title
Taxation of sugar-sweetened beverages for reducing their consumption and preventing obesity or other adverse health outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012319
Authors

Thomas L Heise, Srinivasa V Katikireddi, Frank Pega, Gerald Gartlehner, Candida Fenton, Ursula Griebler, Isolde Sommer, Manuela Pfinder, Stefan K Lhachimi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 128 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 22%
Student > Bachelor 18 14%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 34 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 16%
Psychology 6 5%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 4%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 40 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2017.
All research outputs
#1,311,222
of 16,597,904 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,455
of 11,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,164
of 268,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#57
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,597,904 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.