↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mesh fixation techniques in primary ventral or incisional hernia repair

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Mesh fixation techniques in primary ventral or incisional hernia repair
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011563.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim Mathes, Barbara Prediger, Maren Walgenbach, Robert Siegel

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Professor 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 14 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Unspecified 2 8%
Engineering 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 13 54%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2021.
All research outputs
#15,647,891
of 19,512,142 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,023
of 11,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,810
of 343,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,512,142 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.5. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.