| Title |
Mesh fixation techniques in primary ventral or incisional hernia repair
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011563.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tim Mathes, Barbara Prediger, Maren Walgenbach, Robert Siegel |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 42 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 48 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2021.
All research outputs
#18,807,229
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,567
of 12,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#323,836
of 448,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#147
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.