↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dietary advice for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
358 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Dietary advice for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004097.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucie Nield, Helen Moore, Lee Hooper, Kennedy Cruickshank, Avni Vyas, Vicki Whittaker, Carolyn D Summerbell

Abstract

While initial dietary management immediately after formal diagnosis is an 'accepted' cornerstone of treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, a formal and systematic overview of its efficacy and method of delivery is not currently available.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 358 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
India 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 347 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 79 22%
Student > Bachelor 46 13%
Researcher 42 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 10%
Student > Postgraduate 25 7%
Other 85 24%
Unknown 45 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 161 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 53 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 6%
Social Sciences 17 5%
Psychology 11 3%
Other 34 9%
Unknown 60 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,453,990
of 17,362,547 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,675
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,044
of 158,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,362,547 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.