| Title |
Exercise for the management of cancer-related fatigue in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006145.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fiona Cramp, James Byron-Daniel |
| Abstract |
Cancer-related fatigue is recognised as an important symptom associated with cancer and its treatment. A number of studies have investigated the effects of physical activity in reducing cancer-related fatigue. This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review published in The Cochrane Library (2008, Issue 1). The original review identified some benefits of physical activity on fatigue in cancer both during and after adjuvant treatment. We identified a number of limitations in the evidence, providing clear justification for an updated review. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 14% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 4% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 29 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 48 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 14% |
| Scientists | 10 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 930 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 915 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 146 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 140 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 100 | 11% |
| Researcher | 74 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 55 | 6% |
| Other | 152 | 16% |
| Unknown | 263 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 227 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 147 | 16% |
| Sports and Recreations | 104 | 11% |
| Psychology | 42 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 30 | 3% |
| Other | 89 | 10% |
| Unknown | 291 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 144. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2023.
All research outputs
#274,826
of 24,710,887 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#460
of 12,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,295
of 183,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,710,887 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.