The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Chinese herbal medicine for subfertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007535.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kunyan Zhou, Jing Zhang, Liangzhi Xu, Chi Eung Danforn Lim |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 180 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
| Researcher | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 14% |
| Unknown | 92 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 92 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2022.
All research outputs
#5,370,732
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,468
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,681
of 464,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#116
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 464,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.