↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chinese herbal medicine for subfertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
Title
Chinese herbal medicine for subfertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007535.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kunyan Zhou, Jing Zhang, Liangzhi Xu, Chi Eung Danforn Lim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 152 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 12%
Researcher 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 9 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 5%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 75 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Engineering 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 75 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,787,128
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,208
of 13,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,652
of 460,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#115
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.