↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Methods for managing miscarriage: a network meta‐analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
70 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
Title
Methods for managing miscarriage: a network meta‐analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012602.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jay Ghosh, Argyro Papadopoulou, Adam J Devall, Hannah C Jeffery, Leanne E Beeson, Vivian Do, Malcolm J Price, Aurelio Tobias, Özge Tunçalp, Antonella Lavelanet, Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu, Arri Coomarasamy, Ioannis D Gallos

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 170 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Student > Master 13 8%
Unspecified 10 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 6%
Other 7 4%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 90 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 22%
Unspecified 10 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 96 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#721,711
of 25,809,966 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,334
of 13,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,532
of 462,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,966 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.