↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Information provision for stroke patients and their caregivers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
372 Mendeley
Title
Information provision for stroke patients and their caregivers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001919.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Forster, Lesley Brown, Jane Smith, Allan House, Peter Knapp, John J Wright, John Young

Abstract

Research shows that stroke patients and their families are dissatisfied with the information provided and have a poor understanding of stroke and associated issues.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 372 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 361 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 16%
Student > Bachelor 53 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 14%
Researcher 42 11%
Student > Postgraduate 19 5%
Other 66 18%
Unknown 78 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 95 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 72 19%
Psychology 36 10%
Social Sciences 26 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Other 45 12%
Unknown 88 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,182,832
of 15,298,914 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,273
of 11,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,053
of 122,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,298,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.