| Title |
Information provision for stroke patients and their caregivers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001919.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne Forster, Lesley Brown, Jane Smith, Allan House, Peter Knapp, John J Wright, John Young |
| Abstract |
Research shows that stroke patients and their families are dissatisfied with the information provided and have a poor understanding of stroke and associated issues. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 458 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 448 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 73 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 60 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 12% |
| Researcher | 50 | 11% |
| Other | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 75 | 16% |
| Unknown | 123 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 105 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 81 | 18% |
| Psychology | 39 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 29 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 54 | 12% |
| Unknown | 137 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,250,925
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,646
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,098
of 192,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#92
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.