↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Newer generation antidepressants for depressive disorders in children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
25 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
244 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
661 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Newer generation antidepressants for depressive disorders in children and adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004851.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah E Hetrick, Joanne E McKenzie, Georgina R Cox, Magenta B Simmons, Sally N Merry

Abstract

Depressive disorders are common in young people and are associated with significant negative impacts. Newer generation antidepressants, particularly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), are often used, however evidence of their effectiveness in children and adolescents is not clear. Furthermore, there have been warnings against their use in this population due to concerns about increased risk of suicidal ideation and behaviour.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 661 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Rwanda 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 649 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 107 16%
Student > Bachelor 91 14%
Researcher 85 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 54 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 8%
Other 123 19%
Unknown 149 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 211 32%
Psychology 102 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 6%
Social Sciences 24 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 3%
Other 80 12%
Unknown 180 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2023.
All research outputs
#619,366
of 25,391,701 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,126
of 11,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,263
of 192,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,391,701 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.