| Title |
Sentinel node biopsy for diagnosis of lymph node involvement in endometrial cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013021.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hans Nagar, Nina Wietek, Richard J Goodall, Will Hughes, Mia Schmidt-Hansen, Jo Morrison |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 36% |
| Spain | 2 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 18% |
| Scientists | 3 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 41 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 47 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,391,321
of 24,185,663 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,121
of 12,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,984
of 435,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,185,663 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.