↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tools developed and disseminated by guideline producers to promote the uptake of their guidelines

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
38 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
455 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Tools developed and disseminated by guideline producers to promote the uptake of their guidelines
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010669.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerd Flodgren, Amanda M Hall, Lucy Goulding, Martin P Eccles, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Gillian C Leng, Sasha Shepperd

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 455 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 453 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 85 19%
Researcher 52 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 10%
Student > Bachelor 36 8%
Student > Postgraduate 26 6%
Other 75 16%
Unknown 136 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 117 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 70 15%
Psychology 27 6%
Social Sciences 17 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 3%
Other 50 11%
Unknown 162 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2024.
All research outputs
#1,585,779
of 26,222,113 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,208
of 13,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,579
of 357,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#72
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,222,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.