| Title |
Psychosocial interventions to improve quality of life and emotional wellbeing for recently diagnosed cancer patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007064.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karen Galway, Amanda Black, Marie M Cantwell, Chris R Cardwell, Moyra Mills, Michael Donnelly |
| Abstract |
A cancer diagnosis may lead to significant psychological distress in up to 75% of cases. There is a lack of clarity about the most effective ways to address this psychological distress. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 30% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 20% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 516 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 501 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 69 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 67 | 13% |
| Researcher | 49 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 33 | 6% |
| Other | 104 | 20% |
| Unknown | 146 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 107 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 104 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 74 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 42 | 8% |
| Unknown | 159 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,624,274
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,440
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,164
of 196,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.