The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Endovascular thrombectomy and intra‐arterial interventions for acute ischaemic stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007574.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melinda B Roaldsen, Mirza Jusufovic, Eivind Berge, Haakon Lindekleiv |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 6 | 17% |
| India | 2 | 6% |
| Norway | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 58% |
| Scientists | 8 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Professor | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 69 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 72 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,343,644
of 26,314,361 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,665
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,651
of 463,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,314,361 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 463,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.