↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tracheal suction at birth in non‐vigorous neonates born through meconium‐stained amniotic fluid

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
16 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
Title
Tracheal suction at birth in non‐vigorous neonates born through meconium‐stained amniotic fluid
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012671.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sushma Nangia, Anu Thukral, Deepak Chawla

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 140 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 7 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 5%
Researcher 7 5%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 72 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 17%
Unspecified 12 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Psychology 2 1%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 77 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,381,934
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,939
of 11,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,625
of 445,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.