↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions to improve hearing aid use in adult auditory rehabilitation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
15 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
323 Mendeley
Title
Interventions to improve hearing aid use in adult auditory rehabilitation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010342.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona Barker, Emma Mackenzie, Lynette Elliott, Simon Jones, Simon de Lusignan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 323 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 320 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 13%
Researcher 37 11%
Student > Bachelor 31 10%
Student > Postgraduate 14 4%
Other 53 16%
Unknown 95 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 53 16%
Psychology 24 7%
Social Sciences 16 5%
Neuroscience 12 4%
Other 51 16%
Unknown 101 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,507,990
of 25,387,189 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,260
of 12,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,664
of 353,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#72
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.