↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach for elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach for elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010373.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fan Mei, Kaiyan Hu, Bing Zhao, Qianqian Gao, Fei Chen, Li Zhao, Mei Wu, Liyuan Feng, Zhe Wang, Jinwei Yang, Weiyi Zhang, Bin Ma

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Unknown 4 67%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2021.
All research outputs
#10,455,600
of 18,447,634 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,451
of 11,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,585
of 281,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,447,634 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,835 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.