| Title |
Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach for elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010373.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fan Mei, Kaiyan Hu, Bing Zhao, Qianqian Gao, Fei Chen, Li Zhao, Mei Wu, Liyuan Feng, Zhe Wang, Jinwei Yang, Weiyi Zhang, Bin Ma |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ecuador | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 38 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 41 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2021.
All research outputs
#14,266,699
of 24,950,117 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,520
of 13,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,588
of 436,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#133
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,950,117 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.