↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Single versus combination intravenous anti-pseudomonal antibiotic therapy for people with cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Single versus combination intravenous anti-pseudomonal antibiotic therapy for people with cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002007.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Poppy Holland, Nikki Jahnke

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 10%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Student > Master 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 32 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 37 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2022.
All research outputs
#14,848,594
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,632
of 12,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,466
of 441,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#145
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.