Community level interventions to improve food security in developed countries
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2010
Catherine Burns, Betsy Kristjansson, Gina Harris, Rebecca Armstrong, Steve Cummins, Andrew Black, Mark Lawrence
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||24||21%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||15||13%|
|Student > Bachelor||13||11%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||28||24%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||16||14%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||4||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2021.
All research outputs
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 12,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 182,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.