↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pharmacological interventions versus placebo, no treatment or usual care for osteoporosis in people with chronic kidney disease stages 3-5D

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacological interventions versus placebo, no treatment or usual care for osteoporosis in people with chronic kidney disease stages 3-5D
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013424.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takashi Hara, Yasukazu Hijikata, Yukiko Matsubara, Norio Watanabe

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 20%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 12 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Unknown 14 56%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,114,392
of 19,680,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,703
of 11,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,218
of 336,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,680,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.