The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Protein restriction for diabetic renal disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002181.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lynn M Robertson, Norman Waugh, Aileen Robertson |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Morocco | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 232 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 9% |
| Researcher | 21 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 50 | 21% |
| Unknown | 63 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Unknown | 71 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2021.
All research outputs
#4,479,825
of 25,853,983 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,862
of 13,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,667
of 89,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,853,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,147 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.