↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Incentives and disincentives to participation by clinicians in randomised controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Incentives and disincentives to participation by clinicians in randomised controlled trials
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.mr000021.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer M Rendell, Rowena K Merritt, John Geddes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 4%
Canada 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 130 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 19%
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Other 9 6%
Professor 8 6%
Other 26 19%
Unknown 33 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Psychology 11 8%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 39 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2020.
All research outputs
#14,445,382
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,805
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,644
of 87,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.