↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Double versus single intrauterine insemination (IUI) in stimulated cycles for subfertile couples

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Double versus single intrauterine insemination (IUI) in stimulated cycles for subfertile couples
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003854.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lidija Rakic, Elena Kostova, Ben J Cohlen, Astrid Ep Cantineau

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Other 6 10%
Unspecified 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Professor 2 3%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 27 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 29%
Unspecified 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 28 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2023.
All research outputs
#6,524,537
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,030
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,781
of 446,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#100
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.