↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Double versus single intrauterine insemination (IUI) in stimulated cycles for subfertile couples

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Double versus single intrauterine insemination (IUI) in stimulated cycles for subfertile couples
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003854.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lidija Rakic, Elena Kostova, Ben J Cohlen, Astrid EP Cantineau

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 33%
Psychology 1 11%
Computer Science 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2021.
All research outputs
#10,498,625
of 19,044,106 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,289
of 11,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,585
of 332,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,044,106 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.