↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Double versus single intrauterine insemination (IUI) in stimulated cycles for subfertile couples

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Double versus single intrauterine insemination (IUI) in stimulated cycles for subfertile couples
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003854.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lidija Rakic, Elena Kostova, Ben J Cohlen, Astrid Ep Cantineau

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Other 6 9%
Unspecified 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Professor 2 3%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 35 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 27%
Unspecified 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 36 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2023.
All research outputs
#6,848,027
of 26,370,291 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,261
of 13,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,256
of 451,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#116
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,370,291 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.