The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Nutritional supplementation for nonalcohol‐related fatty liver disease: a network meta‐analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013157.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Oluyemi Komolafe, Elena Buzzetti, Audrey Linden, Lawrence Mj Best, Angela M Madden, Danielle Roberts, Thomas Jg Chase, Dominic Fritche, Suzanne C Freeman, Nicola J Cooper, Alex J Sutton, Elisabeth Jane Milne, Kathy Wright, Chavdar S Pavlov, Brian R Davidson, Emmanuel Tsochatzis, Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 10% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 81% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 29% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 167 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Researcher | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Unknown | 91 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Unknown | 100 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,039,066
of 26,168,182 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,963
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,333
of 450,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,168,182 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.