↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions to improve inhaler technique for adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Interventions to improve inhaler technique for adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd014956
Authors

Sally Spencer, Oliver Hamer, Elizabeth Berger, Andrew Booth, Greg J Irving, Michael Owen, Nicola Relph, Omar Usmani, Carol Kelly

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,515,666
of 19,164,538 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,227
of 11,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,809
of 335,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,164,538 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.