↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
90 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013039.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Falk Schwendicke, Tanya Walsh, Thomas Lamont, Waraf Al-yaseen, Lars Bjørndal, Janet E Clarkson, Margherita Fontana, Jesus Gomez Rossi, Gerd Göstemeyer, Colin Levey, Anne Müller, David Ricketts, Mark Robertson, Ruth M Santamaria, Nicola PT Innes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 211 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Other 11 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 4%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 101 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 39%
Unspecified 6 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Engineering 3 1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 105 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2023.
All research outputs
#542,164
of 24,842,061 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#989
of 12,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,802
of 429,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,842,061 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.