| Title |
Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013039.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Falk Schwendicke, Tanya Walsh, Thomas Lamont, Waraf Al-yaseen, Lars Bjørndal, Janet E Clarkson, Margherita Fontana, Jesus Gomez Rossi, Gerd Göstemeyer, Colin Levey, Anne Müller, David Ricketts, Mark Robertson, Ruth M Santamaria, Nicola PT Innes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 17% |
| Saudi Arabia | 13 | 14% |
| Japan | 8 | 9% |
| Ireland | 4 | 4% |
| Chile | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 28 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 57 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 22 | 24% |
| Scientists | 10 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 211 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 14% |
| Unknown | 101 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 82 | 39% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
| Engineering | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 105 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2023.
All research outputs
#542,164
of 24,842,061 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#989
of 12,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,802
of 429,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,842,061 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.