↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
89 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013039.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Falk Schwendicke, Tanya Walsh, Thomas Lamont, Waraf Al-yaseen, Lars Bjørndal, Janet E Clarkson, Margherita Fontana, Jesus Gomez Rossi, Gerd Göstemeyer, Colin Levey, Anne Müller, David Ricketts, Mark Robertson, Ruth M Santamaria, Nicola PT Innes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 151 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Other 7 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Professor 5 3%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 78 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Psychology 2 1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 81 54%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2023.
All research outputs
#493,949
of 23,368,819 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#938
of 12,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,227
of 438,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,368,819 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.