The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Exercise training for adult lung transplant recipients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012307.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruvistay Gutierrez-Arias, Maria José Martinez-Zapata, Monica C Gaete-Mahn, Dimelza Osorio, Luis Bustos, Joel Melo Tanner, Ricardo Hidalgo, Pamela Seron |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 3 | 14% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 222 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 7% |
| Researcher | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Unknown | 130 | 59% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Psychology | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 140 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,040,132
of 26,245,314 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,185
of 13,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,747
of 450,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#61
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,245,314 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.