↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Diagnostic tests for oral cancer and potentially malignant disorders in patients presenting with clinically evident lesions

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
16 tweeters
Title
Diagnostic tests for oral cancer and potentially malignant disorders in patients presenting with clinically evident lesions
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010276.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tanya Walsh, Richard Macey, Alexander R Kerr, Mark W Lingen, Graham R Ogden, Saman Warnakulasuriya

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,104,784
of 18,432,973 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,792
of 11,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,279
of 175,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,432,973 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.