↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Rehabilitation for ankle fractures in adults

Overview of attention for article published in this source, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
425 Mendeley
Title
Rehabilitation for ankle fractures in adults
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005595.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lin, Chung-Wei Christine, Donkers, Nicole AJ, Refshauge, Kathryn M, Beckenkamp, Paula R, Khera, Kriti, Moseley, Anne M

Abstract

Rehabilitation after ankle fracture can begin soon after the fracture has been treated, either surgically or non-surgically, by the use of different types of immobilisation that allow early commencement of weight-bearing or exercise. Alternatively, rehabilitation, including the use of physical or manual therapies, may start following the period of immobilisation. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2008.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 425 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 417 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 80 19%
Student > Master 56 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 34 8%
Student > Postgraduate 31 7%
Other 86 20%
Unknown 94 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 162 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 75 18%
Sports and Recreations 17 4%
Psychology 13 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Other 35 8%
Unknown 111 26%