↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Graduated compression stockings for the initial treatment of varicose veins in people without venous ulceration 

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
5 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
Title
Graduated compression stockings for the initial treatment of varicose veins in people without venous ulceration 
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008819.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah L Knight Nee Shingler, Lindsay Robertson, Marlene Stewart

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 110 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Researcher 8 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Other 6 5%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 57 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Engineering 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 57 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,830,702
of 26,388,114 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,742
of 13,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,079
of 451,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#55
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,388,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.