↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Primary care professionals providing non-urgent care in hospital emergency departments

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Primary care professionals providing non-urgent care in hospital emergency departments
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002097.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaspreet K Khangura, Gerd Flodgren, Rafael Perera, Brian H Rowe, Sasha Shepperd

Abstract

In many countries emergency departments (EDs) are facing an increase in demand for services, long-waits and severe crowding. One response to mitigate overcrowding has been to provide primary care services alongside or within hospital EDs for patients with non-urgent problems. It is not known, however, how this impacts the quality of patient care, the utilisation of hospital resources, or if it is cost-effective. 

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Brazil 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 149 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 18%
Researcher 27 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 38 24%
Unknown 16 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 16%
Psychology 10 6%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 20 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#3,022,401
of 19,764,860 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,578
of 11,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,214
of 278,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#245
of 471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,764,860 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.