| Title |
Tailored or adapted interventions for adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and at least one other long‐term condition: a mixed methods review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013384.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma J Dennett, Sadia Janjua, Elizabeth Stovold, Samantha L Harrison, Melissa J McDonnell, Anne E Holland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| Denmark | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 397 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 397 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 43 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 9% |
| Researcher | 33 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 47 | 12% |
| Unknown | 207 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 55 | 14% |
| Psychology | 9 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 33 | 8% |
| Unknown | 221 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2023.
All research outputs
#5,279,666
of 25,632,496 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,536
of 13,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,983
of 443,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#110
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,632,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.