↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Compression bandages or stockings versus no compression for treating venous leg ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
43 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
270 Mendeley
Title
Compression bandages or stockings versus no compression for treating venous leg ulcers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013397.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chunhu Shi, Jo C Dumville, Nicky Cullum, Emma Connaughton, Gill Norman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 270 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 10%
Student > Master 22 8%
Researcher 15 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 12 4%
Other 45 17%
Unknown 136 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 16%
Unspecified 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Other 12 4%
Unknown 144 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,139,906
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,280
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,543
of 445,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.