Eu não sei ler gráficos, mas isso confirma melhor? Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte, mostrando que o índice de mortes caiu muito pós iverm, os dados só vão até 2021, mas o artigo é atualizado https://t.co/K4ejnauLGU
@Fordy8173 @FreeWCH Ivermectin is ineffective against SARS-CoV-2 based on double-blind randomized clinical trials with inert placebo. Natural medicine is pseudoscientific quackery and lacking data for efficacy. https://t.co/blI8Iorbiy
RT @nickmmark: If you want an actual meta-analysis, done by reputable experts, check out the updated one by Cochrane: https://t.co/1tjYMOdr…
If you want an actual meta-analysis, done by reputable experts, check out the updated one by Cochrane: https://t.co/1tjYMOdruF Spoiler alert: “For outpatients, there is currently low‐ to high-certainty evidence that ivermectin has no beneficial effect for
@joebhoy1971 @richmcmullan @DeborahMeaden Here is some more studies that show it is useless. https://t.co/WhxbisxQx9 https://t.co/n6EwpgGzP4 I could continue quite easily. Ivermectin's main use is killing parasites in hearts of Animals, mostly cattle, w
@CKellyUAP C19early organisation is anonymous . They claim they are composed of PhD holders but will not disclose their names. Here is the research by JAMA regarding Ivermectin: https://t.co/xP1SudSgoj And Cochrane Library: https://t.co/K8u3H7N9eb Th
@RyanD_T @JohnMappin @KimDotcom "No trial investigated ivermectin to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection." "We also found 31 ongoing trials, and an additional 28 trials still requiring clarification from the authors or not yet published." https://t.co/gmhfYEwWR
@Leeleeliberty11 @IPatriot90 @lignebur72 @DrEliDavid why do you think it couldn't show value against covid-19 in actual controlled trials? It's a conspiracy again, isn't it. https://t.co/ZHtVldJEa5
@TonyHinton2016 Cochrane review does not agree https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7
@Artemizia_123 @JRSAZ69 Why promote something with no antiviral properties to counter a virus? https://t.co/x2Rbr2VRrM https://t.co/vwhbMIeY1s https://t.co/w3oxQ1Ps8L
@SitSilver @Unheilpraktiker @Oliver25493862 @MS22029 @ThomasBe222 @plej_a @Heicapa1 @NarfGb @Shania20204 @NoDealNever @realism_climate @kessaku5 @Elke_Austenat @RWittenbrink @SHomburg @ZuckerZucker3 Zu IVM, nur um das nicht so stehen zu lassen. Weiter bei
@HAmesbauer @MarignoniMartin Ja verrückt Dinge zu empfehlen welche nicht wirken bzw bei Überdosierung tödlich sein können. Nach dem rechten Motto- flood the world with shit! https://t.co/yAcNruiKIk
@marc_g_wathelet @K_G_Andersen 🥱 Sad that you're still peddling garbage like ivmmeta. No wonder you're scientifically illiterate + paranoid on COVID-19-related topics. https://t.co/YqxsHgUqbd https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 | Cochrane https://t.co/BPAcsezeQy
@profrobmartens @GidMK @SRaaijmakers @CovidAnalysis Same groups on unreliable contrarian websites that willfully misled credulous non-experts on ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, etc. https://t.co/lInREyq25C https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC
@TheBeanEyesOpen I’ll just leave this here again. https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7
@TheBeanEyesOpen No (sadly) neither has been shown to work. https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7
@CKellyUAP @TigerlillySusan @__anoop__ @ChrisJohnsonMD @RobertKennedyJr Let folks known when you have a source that isn't long-debunked non-peer-reviewed nonsense. https://t.co/wqlgpTFVHR https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/sCDn2zr2XI
@__anoop__ @CKellyUAP @TigerlillySusan @ChrisJohnsonMD @RobertKennedyJr Actually, it's not credible because it's non-peer-reviewed nonsense that's been repeatedly debunked and doesn't match published evidence. Not only are you biased, you're incredibly ba
@TiamatRoar @mentalyentil @LadyDoctorSays "We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating or preventing COVID‐19 infection" https://t.co/J9PIE7ux1P
@LimesAndMangos Ja, beschäftigen Sie sich mal mit dem Internet. Auf Cochrane geben Corona-Verharmloser doch sonst gerne so viel. https://t.co/xETDdOReik
@DocDeezWhat @mongoosenewyork @frank_zelenko Cochrane is how you do such analysis. Here’s there’s https://t.co/60OMQfjTNV
@SmarterSig @jcatskill And on the basis of that you would be happy with a world wide roll out? So then how do you explain this? https://t.co/nW52bsFk94
@sigmashrink @RudieBdeV @DrDavidNL @jorgje @MarionKoopmans @mauricedehond Cochrane is negatief https://t.co/f9Bt1B2Pbu
@SudarshanDas @DrHenryEaly Oh, yes! The Zelenko Protocol which relies so heavily on ivermectin - haha. Oh, wait a minute - it involves NO ivermectin at all. Meantime: https://t.co/m64SgP5Ug2 https://t.co/YyfpclXa9u https://t.co/Fs0GHVrsu4
@FrebinDrank @PSItsPersonal @MikahMiriam @ReganD71 @PeterHotez No, I'm going to say that the quantity of studies isn't the same as them actually being high quality studies with good sample sizes. When you look at those, again and again, it just doesn't wor
@patrioticllama @KayInfinite28 @Grzabjj @PeterHotez Horse paste doesn't work on covid https://t.co/UUcxZnNgUv
RT @thebadstats: 9/ Metaanalysis for ivermectin: https://t.co/Cb76I32LgF - doesn't work! (I'm linking a @GidMK tweet instead of a publish…
RT @thebadstats: 9/ Metaanalysis for ivermectin: https://t.co/Cb76I32LgF - doesn't work! (I'm linking a @GidMK tweet instead of a publish…
RT @thebadstats: 9/ Metaanalysis for ivermectin: https://t.co/Cb76I32LgF - doesn't work! (I'm linking a @GidMK tweet instead of a publish…
RT @thebadstats: 9/ Metaanalysis for ivermectin: https://t.co/Cb76I32LgF - doesn't work! (I'm linking a @GidMK tweet instead of a publish…
RT @thebadstats: 9/ Metaanalysis for ivermectin: https://t.co/Cb76I32LgF - doesn't work! (I'm linking a @GidMK tweet instead of a publish…
RT @thebadstats: 9/ Metaanalysis for ivermectin: https://t.co/Cb76I32LgF - doesn't work! (I'm linking a @GidMK tweet instead of a publish…
RT @thebadstats: 9/ Metaanalysis for ivermectin: https://t.co/Cb76I32LgF - doesn't work! (I'm linking a @GidMK tweet instead of a publish…
RT @thebadstats: 9/ Metaanalysis for ivermectin: https://t.co/Cb76I32LgF - doesn't work! (I'm linking a @GidMK tweet instead of a publish…
RT @thebadstats: 9/ Metaanalysis for ivermectin: https://t.co/Cb76I32LgF - doesn't work! (I'm linking a @GidMK tweet instead of a publish…
@MagicFistme42 @lebon80 Raté, essayez encore. Preuves, Cochrane, pourtant cité par Raoult comme les meilleurs arrive à des conclusions non favorables à l’ivermectine : https://t.co/3xDhy0hjxV Les grands journalistes sont au courant : https://t.co/5vZS5IWdJ
RT @thebadstats: 9/ Metaanalysis for ivermectin: https://t.co/Cb76I32LgF - doesn't work! (I'm linking a @GidMK tweet instead of a publish…
RT @thebadstats: 9/ Metaanalysis for ivermectin: https://t.co/Cb76I32LgF - doesn't work! (I'm linking a @GidMK tweet instead of a publish…
RT @thebadstats: 9/ Metaanalysis for ivermectin: https://t.co/Cb76I32LgF - doesn't work! (I'm linking a @GidMK tweet instead of a publish…
9/ Metaanalysis for ivermectin: https://t.co/Cb76I32LgF - doesn't work! (I'm linking a @GidMK tweet instead of a published metaanalysis because his is more up to date and includes more studies. (follow him!) But official meta-analyses find the same: http
@Nothv13 @KD2NFC @Jenny_jones1978 @goddeketal @mpc_xetts @PeterHotez @DocDeezWhat @Debunk_the_Funk @IanCopeland5 That’s what Cochrane is for https://t.co/60OMQfjTNV
@JHC_53 @BruceYoung1963 @goddeketal @PeterHotez @joerogan No. Studies do not show that. They show the opposite. Cochrane is gold standard. https://t.co/tXtGYkPDY9
@debthecohost There's many studies documented on pubmed. Here's one https://t.co/3WSKemfbXc
@DannyC_DC1111 because the study is garbage No study compared ivermectin to an intervention with proven efficacy. https://t.co/cVYS5tTDea secret government propaganda site... or where all the US government research is vetted. try it out...
@KD2NFC @goddeketal @mpc_xetts @PeterHotez @DocDeezWhat There are numerous well powered RCTs that all show ivermectin does f*ck all. The Cochrane study showed that https://t.co/60OMQfjTNV
RT @AtomsksSanakan: 7/V So ivermectin fans mislead when they complain about terms like "horse de-wormer", without acknowledging the *POISO…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: 7/V So ivermectin fans mislead when they complain about terms like "horse de-wormer", without acknowledging the *POISO…
@dudu_wudu @VeganCardio @EckerleIsabella P.S. es konnte bei Ivermectin kein Nutzen und Wirksamkeit gegen COVID gefunden werden. https://t.co/GlmxvjlmSd
@Terence_009 @ztkelly @DrAseemMalhotra Hospitals all started using dexamethasone as soon as it was shown to work. It’s cheap, off patent, available in IV and oral forms and widely available even in LMIC (which rather dispels the profit concerns). As for iv
@LisaXX____ @gorepainmeat @NMoonitz @watershedchron @MattBinder You can't use a single study to claim that it works. It was found again and again that ivermectin had no effect. https://t.co/TaNY5TwAtF
@nickmmark @TheLancet So 'long COVID' results differing from their prior COVID-OUT study on preventing severe COVID-19. ivmmeta + the like will no doubt feed nonsense to their credulous conspiracist audience about this. 🙄 https://t.co/R11qt2Eriy https://
@ZaklinaczLosiow @tomaawroblewski Łoś w niedoczekaniu na Twoje "źródła" tutaj badanie pokazuje zupełnie coś innego. https://t.co/LOEVlrkCSK
@GRD_PL_2 @tomaawroblewski O te testy chodzi?? https://t.co/LOEVlrkCSK Testy pokazaly ze gówno daje.
@DIA01010101 @tomaawroblewski Masz już wiesz kto jest szurem. https://t.co/LOEVlrkCSK
RT @BRxAD: @elonmusk @VigilantFox @CommunityNotes No. That's just a list of studies performed. Need to actually read the studies and critic…
RT @BRxAD: @elonmusk @VigilantFox @CommunityNotes No. That's just a list of studies performed. Need to actually read the studies and critic…
@WakeUpSpeakOut @bfhermann @elonmusk @VigilantFox @CommunityNotes Why? It's already known to be nonsense. https://t.co/YqxsHgUqbd https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/zb4TidfQR1 https://t.co/ty49vjZitF https://t.co/s9TgIqIuLr
@matt7gh @RisatoNicola @SecchiLuigi We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection. ⬇️ https://t.co/q2fiY02qWD
@human_raise @wietse_de_vries @timdouwsma https://t.co/pxB5pbGT1k Alsjeblieft.
@VigilantFox @elonmusk @CommunityNotes @EpochTimes VigilantFox + Epoch Times are deceptive, as usual, not that Elon Musk honestly cares about facts. You don't just count studies. You assess them for *quality* https://t.co/cN6JYxqiq4 https://t.co/sLyR0qQ
@elonmusk @VigilantFox @CommunityNotes No. That's just a list of studies performed. Need to actually read the studies and critically appraise the quality of evidence. 1. https://t.co/KSacgjrxZ1 2. https://t.co/jxrLBQZflp
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @HouleEvelyne @lonnibesancon Your link is as worthless as ivmmeta is on ivermectin. Unsurprising, since it's likely mad…
@HouleEvelyne @lonnibesancon Let me know when you can honestly address the criticism of the garbage source you posted on hydroxychloroquine, and the abundant evidence showing hydroxychloroquine doesn't work. Until then, bye, non-expert conspiracist. http
@HouleEvelyne @lonnibesancon Your link is as worthless as ivmmeta is on ivermectin. Unsurprising, since it's likely made by the same conspiracist crackpots. https://t.co/Nxy3AwRzr2 https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/zb4TidfQR1 h
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @MdBreathe @19joho So, @MdBreathe, is there some reason you're liking a tweet that debunked your claims on ivermectin?…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @MdBreathe @19joho So, @MdBreathe, is there some reason you're liking a tweet that debunked your claims on ivermectin?…
@MdBreathe @19joho So, @MdBreathe, is there some reason you're liking a tweet that debunked your claims on ivermectin? And relying on deceptive nonsense like what ivmmeta fabricates about studies, is not going to help your position. https://t.co/wqlgpTFV
@WotsOnInfo @bbtwos @Auusi @goddeketal @hiltzikm There are also numerous studies showing it is ineffective. https://t.co/M1c09DtyA3 https://t.co/bkRjgWaA9W https://t.co/FekjMwBMkp
@InfiniteCyclus @lawrie_dr @OracleFilmsUK @WHO 1. Evidence quality *far* more important than quantity (10 poorly-designed trials don't trump 1 well-designed one) 2. Cochrane reviews are the gold standard of evidence appraisal, assessing reliability of tri
@ettourneur @verity_france Vous mentionnez des médecins, chercheurs dans votre famille. Donc vous savez un peu comment ça marche. Il y a bien des organismes auxquels vous faites confiance non? Par ex Cochrane, vanté par Raoult https://t.co/A3thACxuLA
@kharaguchi メタ解析も玉石混合。論文不正でとっくに取り下げられた論文を含めて「有意差あり」としてるところも多く注意が必要です 一番信用できるのは厚労省お墨付きのコクランレビューでしょう コクランによれば『イベルメクチンの有効性と安全性については不確実と結論』とのこと https://t.co/dH26xYT8aR