@Ozcr123 El día que sepas leer ciencia y no « periodistas » hablamos. https://t.co/5RkFqFgRvk

RT @FriendsOfSciMed: Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 https://t.co/KCb49UXCT1

Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 https://t.co/KCb49UXCT1

@patricksavalle https://t.co/R2sPFMyrlS “Treatment with ivermectin did not result in a lower incidence of medical admission to a hospital” https://t.co/fs5V2zYagK “Ivermectin compared with placebo or usual care 28 days after treatment, may make little or

@Grain_Cycles @davidfrum So far the science does not support its use for Covid. Get over it. https://t.co/uXiwDPq8EM

@SamDCapitalist @nicksortor https://t.co/jn8JCv8POQ Ivermectin is not an effective treatment for Covid.

@nicksortor Ivermectin is unproven and not recommended. https://t.co/jn8JCv8POQ

@Letleo572 @keith_dorschner @RepMTG @COVIDSelect https://t.co/jn8JCv8POQ

@1973jporter @keith_dorschner @RepMTG @COVIDSelect Yes. https://t.co/jn8JCv8POQ

@FedUpRetMarine @jxrbot @keith_dorschner @RepMTG @COVIDSelect Ivermectin is bullshit. https://t.co/jn8JCv8POQ

@keith_dorschner @RepMTG @COVIDSelect Ivermectin is bullshit. https://t.co/jn8JCv8POQ

@RepMTG @COVIDSelect Ivermectin is fucking bullshit for Covid. https://t.co/jn8JCv8POQ

@VikChatterjee @MaccaoMixes @theserfstv https://t.co/QGKWGNlSDz

@RobertRiver67 @koc134 @MakeMeWholeYou @healingfromlc The number of trials is irrelevant, it's the quality of the studies that counts—Cochrane reviews are the gold standard for appraising medical studies... ...and they found no evidence of benefit, &

@DjuliMurti @EckerleIsabella 🤡🤦🏻‍♂️ https://t.co/IhfzBOfoI8 https://t.co/Y6KlqoYRv8

@nexxypoo @NassMeryl Remarkable to still cling to it at this point, but if you ignore all the early bogus & tiny studies (remember, it all started due to Egyptian scammers), there are a dozen large trials. It failed all of them. https://t.co/5z79dprkz

@JGisSatoshi @sjs856 Plus, they include all the retracted ones! Cochrane goes through this. Really, 'C19' and similar are pages designed to dupe people w/confirmation bias and an inability to read thoughtfully. https://t.co/5z79dprkz9

@ReynaudRossana @guilhemeric https://t.co/A3thACxuLA

@ereyes @SUgayos @Jaime_Culebras @sanidadgob @apetp_ @StopPseudo https://t.co/7zMy2PnDrf Te lo busqué en castellano, que ya sabemos que solo hablas ingles en la intimidad como Feijoo. 🤷

@ChrisManc9 @RMConservative Literally every large RCT. All of them. It's useless. https://t.co/5z79dprkz9 https://t.co/dQ4WXmoXvr Even the manufacturer https://t.co/c43rJB4l1I All tested together. Metformin showed promise. And it's cheap & widely

@jlstock_james @catturd2 https://t.co/CmnAviPe9a

@CitoyenPoete @France5tv ... la réalité disparaîtra. Sur l'Ivermectine, Cochrane, source reconnue par Raoult https://t.co/A3thACxuLA

@JeffBernard1 @LeadingReport @naomirwolf You like Cochrane reviews or only those that support your view? https://t.co/hngtwAPow6

@drsimonegold Is this the same Cochrane Institute that says Ivermectin is useless in treatment and prevention of COVID-19? https://t.co/hngtwAPow6

@MolaRamLinux @enespacio @Karlton111 @comboverwhelmed @Lietdansnewlegs @skratch_karma @Resistenzanow @TorrieTruth @ArchLuminous @AmericanBird784 @PunditParanoia @AdorablePodcast @camp_terrence @Pis0Mojado @VinceGottalotta @Alion4Truth @ZiggystarZiggy @WIMo

@RickNas95547619 @DrJBhattacharya @RandPaul Correct. I was only explaining how RW media misinformation necessitated CDC and poison control centers to respond. If you want to see randomized clinical trials and meta studies on ivermectin see these studies

@JuCJuse @rt7683 @real_seeking 🙄 https://t.co/wqlgpTFVHR https://t.co/ChHQ0Y99jk

RT @AtomsksSanakan: @filipe_rafaeli @sudokuvariante @gtuckerkellogg @CureusInc Still wasting people's time with a disinformation site like…

@ArtsenC @US_FDA Ivermectine werkt in een reageerbuis tegen sarscov2, maar die concentraties kunnen in het lichaam niet worden gehaald met een veilige dosis. https://t.co/39E5q6pQBP In studies van goede methodologische kwaliteit wordt geen effectiviteit ge

@JKelleyK @MdBreathe @US_FDA These were the goal posts 🤷‍♀️

@subboy777 @dr_jon_l @PierreKory Is this the study? https://t.co/ykJP2l5Elu

@BSCrusher1 @blafor68 @jason_willz1 @lawrie_dr The anonymous meta-analysis that’s convincing people to use ivermectin https://t.co/P29ri9nywf https://t.co/btnd76Us0L

@MdBreathe @US_FDA It does have a good side effect profile. Sadly despite promising early in vitro plus some observational data against Covid19, it has repeatedly failed to show benefit in RCTs. What are your thoughts on the cochrane review (and the 11 RCT

@Roger_Dyroy Cochrane konkluderer annerledes https://t.co/jRJmVgiNTd

@ArtsenC Ivermectine werkt in een reageerbuis tegen sarscov2, maar die concentraties kunnen in het lichaam niet worden gehaald met een veilige dosis. https://t.co/39E5q6pQBP In studies van goede methodologische kwaliteit wordt geen effectiviteit gevonden h

@HannaSokajarvi Tämänkin jälkeen on tullut useampia rct-julkaisuja, ja niissä evidenssi ei puolla ivermektiiniä https://t.co/ze3IldGIZf

@stevocarter1 @Aimhigheruk1 @Phil_Burgundy @Johnincarlisle @vanstone_r71419 @YouTube Hey Stevo, in case you missed it. There are a dozen large trials out there. They included one. And completely lie about it. Look at the Cochrane summary. Ask yourself why

@Aimhigheruk1 @Phil_Burgundy @Johnincarlisle @vanstone_r71419 @YouTube Given you are an ivermectin fanatic, apparently you need help. ALL large RCTs were consistent. https://t.co/5z79dprkz9 https://t.co/V1444n8Wmd https://t.co/c43rJB4l1I https://t.co/2

@Nomoretrust8 @RolandDunbrack @Johnincarlisle @YouTube https://t.co/zv3ojXa5Bo

@JohnJerkoff58 @EAustensen @Johnincarlisle @YouTube So to be clear, ivermectin is great for parasites, completely useless for COVID. Are we on the same page there at least? https://t.co/5z79dprkz9 https://t.co/oBTThRbQWe

@FrankPeeters4 Omdat er geen harde evidentie is - cfr Cochrane https://t.co/KfbhRKC7FQ Zelfde maatstaf waarom ik tegen verplichte mondmaskers was: geen evidentie.

@Johnincarlisle @YouTube What do you make of the cochrane review @Johnincarlisle? Maybe you could discuss the 11 studies and overall conclusions in a YouTube video? https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7

@wideglide002 @EAustensen @Johnincarlisle @YouTube But it wasn't proven to work. It was hyped following multiple fraudulent preprints, which have since been retracted. And then it was proven *not* to work in several large, high-quality trials. https://t.co

@DrJBhattacharya @BrentTings52730 @neilh2o Stop playing on both side of the fence... you know iverm does shit versus covid https://t.co/65LQdoegF3

@ManuelDUPONT7 @Dr_Steph_GAYET @Randy64_fr Je ferais davantage confiance à cette revue : https://t.co/JqD8aAdb8Q

L’ivermectine dans la prévention et le traitement de la COVID-19 | Cochrane https://t.co/JqD8aAdb8Q

@BretWeinstein Every single major clinical trial has shown it's completely useless for COVID. Not even a question at this point. All this based on a fraudulent study out of Egypt 😂 https://t.co/5z79dprkz9 High doses. Magic concoction treatments, early t

@elimarty_4 @ArthurTSJackson @sherrib48509 @NoLieWithBTC Here is Cochrane, they take all the studies done on Ivermectin, then they separate studies that were peer reviewed & take out studies that were retracted. & this is the result: https://t.co/

@volkspartei https://t.co/Y6MEreDpHc

@alterdonauwels @GeraldGrosz Komisch, dass man davon bei den Zulassungsbehörden nicht ein Wort findet. Manche haben ja den Fehler gemacht und die Dosis für Pferde genommen, während sie die Dosis für Esel oder aber auch die Covid-Infektion oder die Impfung

@Phillip_Altman4 https://t.co/0zYvW6gzpH

@irEnriqueCortes Ivermectine werkt in een reageerbuis tegen sarscov2, maar die concentraties kunnen in het lichaam niet worden gehaald met een veilige dosis. https://t.co/39E5q6pQBP In studies van goede methodologische kwaliteit wordt geen effectiviteit ge

@irEnriqueCortes Ivermectine werkt in een reageerbuis tegen sarscov2, maar die concentraties kunnen in het lichaam niet worden gehaald met een veilige dosis. https://t.co/39E5q6pQBP In studies van goede methodologische kwaliteit wordt geen effectiviteit ge

@brent2501 @wendibloomenth1 @globeandmail https://t.co/kFelhv29av

@brent2501 @StanMar18422557 @wendibloomenth1 @globeandmail https://t.co/kFelhv29av

@brent2501 @StanMar18422557 @wendibloomenth1 @globeandmail Ivermectin, an antiparasitic agent used to treat parasitic infestation, inhibits the replication of viruses in vitro. ivermectin's antiviral mode of action suggests an inhibitory effect on severe

@plej_a @Maga113377 @Gaby06870254 @Karl_Lauterbach Weil es nicht wirkt. https://t.co/dCA6Gu348m

@RobertM72103719 @jason_willz1 @ErikMagnethi Well the first two studies are combination therapies, not a rct on ivermectin alone. The third study is downright fraudulent. https://t.co/k6Sd3y8jSY https://t.co/D1ZzeCUaSA

RT @AtomsksSanakan: @WeareTheCypher @Meagain10411919 @BreezerGalway @jason_willz1 https://t.co/wqlgpTFVHR

@WeareTheCypher @Meagain10411919 @BreezerGalway @jason_willz1 https://t.co/wqlgpTFVHR

@RobertM72103719 @jason_willz1 @ErikMagnethi Your source is nonsense. https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/zb4TidfQR1 https://t.co/ty49vjZitF https://t.co/qxTOF02Qk2

@elhigadodmarita Consulta en base a que estudios se quiere juzgar a los que critican el uso de invermectina? Porque la revisión científica más seria de todos los estudios realizados en paciente mostraron que no había ventajas. Muchos mejoraron sin nada ent

RT @mrscorer: @BreezerGalway @eskimosikyung @Covid19Critical @SwaledaleMutton @LaymansScience @BerryTartlet Correct. IVM does work. There i…

@BreezerGalway @eskimosikyung @Covid19Critical @SwaledaleMutton @LaymansScience @BerryTartlet Correct. IVM does work. There is an issue. The dosage required will likely kill you first. Or if lucky your liver. https://t.co/w3oxQ1Ps8L

@filipe_rafaeli @sudokuvariante @gtuckerkellogg @CureusInc Still wasting people's time with a disinformation site like ivmmeta. 🙄 https://t.co/173oqokGcO https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/zb4TidfQR1 https://t.co/ty49vjZitF http

@real_seeking @TheChiefNerd https://t.co/qubAExpigC

@real_seeking @TheChiefNerd https://t.co/qubAExpigC

@real_seeking @TheChiefNerd “We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection.” https://t.co/NWIRT0cKME

@Dr_logicaI @thereal_truther Cochrane review of all the evidence "We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection" 🎯 https://t.co/TMjecYzmw4

@ProfTimNoakes What do you think of the 11 RCTs reviewed in the Cochrane systematic review of ivermectin in Covid-19 and their overall conclusion @ProfTimNoakes? https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7

@fee_clochette91 @YvanLamy Ce n’est pas l’état des connaissances de la FDA mais l’état des connaissances scientifiques. https://t.co/O9iIaUOUrf

@Degsindef0007 https://t.co/AvSgUc2cfp https://t.co/baFNsCBUJB

RT @WiscguyNE: @kasmith58 @clabaugh_mark @AntonioSabatoJr @thetoyman1 Apparently you haven’t looked. Here is a link. More listed at the bot…

@kasmith58 @clabaugh_mark @AntonioSabatoJr @thetoyman1 Apparently you haven’t looked. Here is a link. More listed at the bottom. https://t.co/Hp0aRiRIqS

@MarkSantaniello @The_JL_Podcast @MdBreathe @kroger Based off that response, something tells me you don’t understand a single word on that study that I sent. 🤥 Here’s another study that proves Ivermectin is completely ineffective at treating COVID 19. Rea

@MdBreathe @PierreKory What do you make of the cochrane review @MdBreathe? I’ve also asked Dr Kory and Dr Laurie but so far no reply https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7

@Evan_Branson @CosmosMom1 @MattBinder Speaking of data... https://t.co/l5gqagtbsz

@harvey_truth @dr_jon_l @PierreKory But no mention of other confounding variables (such as population density). We can only learn so much from ecological studies & the RCTs on ivermectin sadly haven’t been able to replicate the findings of the in vitro

@RuiLima85 @Mmacedo_tweets Blablablabla https://t.co/65LQdoegF3

@Lulu_b_lou @HRP1479 @JohnBoweActor @price_nicola @PierreKory @lawrie_dr @Covid19Critical As it goes I posed this exact question to Dr Kory just yesterday. Waiting for a reply

@Jack_Giovannini @giusbrindisi Forse non ti rendi conto che stai dicendo che l'ivermectina sarebbe efficace perché lo afferma uno che è contro i vaccini a mRNA? Grazie al ca@@o. Gli screenshot, le notizie di Epoch Times o le opinioni non servono a nulla. L

@irEnriqueCortes Ivermectine werkt in een reageerbuis tegen sarscov2, maar die concentraties kunnen in het lichaam niet worden gehaald met een veilige dosis. https://t.co/39E5q6pQBP In studies van goede methodologische kwaliteit wordt geen effectiviteit ge

@VelzenRemco Ivermectine werkt in een reageerbuis tegen sarscov2, maar die concentraties kunnen in het lichaam niet worden gehaald met een veilige dosis. https://t.co/39E5q6pQBP In studies van goede methodologische kwaliteit wordt geen effectiviteit gevond

@veen_els @IGJnl Ivermectine werkt in een reageerbuis tegen sarscov2, maar die concentraties kunnen in het lichaam niet worden gehaald met een veilige dosis. https://t.co/39E5q6pQBP In studies van goede methodologische kwaliteit wordt geen effectiviteit ge

@StevenArra @vanranstmarc Ivermectine werkt in een reageerbuis tegen sarscov2, maar die concentraties kunnen in het lichaam niet worden gehaald met een veilige dosis. https://t.co/39E5q6pQBP In studies van goede methodologische kwaliteit wordt geen effecti

@ruudoverdegrens @dancalegria @IGJnl Correct. Ivermectine werkt in een reageerbuis tegen sarscov2, maar die concentraties kunnen in het lichaam niet worden gehaald met een veilige dosis. https://t.co/39E5q6pQBP In studies van goede methodologische kwalitei

@SenRonJohnson @US_FDA https://t.co/hKmwVOMpy0

@m_ishetzat @RonaldKuilder 1. Het is een FDA advocaat die dit zegt, niet een arts 2. Het is toegestaan het middel voor te schrijven, maar het heeft geen werking tegen covid en wordt dus door FDA artsen ook niet geadviseerd. https://t.co/NWIRT0cKME We fo

For an evidence based perspective on ivermectin to treat COVID, see here: https://t.co/WcqzSJAZip https://t.co/LraBjFR2vg

@Lulu_b_lou @HRP1479 @JohnBoweActor @price_nicola @PierreKory @lawrie_dr This cochrane review? https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7

@PierreKory Don’t fall for the lies of Pierre. “We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection.” https://t.co/NWIRT0cKME

@PierreKory What do you make of the cochrane review on RCT of ivermectin for Covid-19 @PierreKory? https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7

@P_McCulloughMD @US_FDA Sadly in RCT done looking at effectiveness of ivermectin in Covid-19, the promising results found in the retrospective cohort ICON study have not been able to be replicated https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7

@BorgerPieter Alhoewel het volledig onethisch was om op basis van dit bewijs trials uit te voeren in mensen, werd ook daar bevestigd: ivermectine werkt niet in de mens tegen COVID https://t.co/OEL1MqNPpt https://t.co/sibZgKex8A

@catturd2 That repeatedly in studies from around the world it isn’t effective in covid19? https://t.co/eUGwhvB0V7

@RadaSeigfried @Holterdipolter5 @RA_MarkusHaintz https://t.co/PGmDqqSzSH

@BorgerPieter Nope. Ivermectine werkt in een reageerbuis tegen sarscov2, maar die concentraties kunnen in het lichaam niet worden gehaald met een veilige dosis. https://t.co/39E5q6pQBP In studies van goede methodologische kwaliteit wordt geen effectiviteit

RT @lamarshall: @Sabra_Security @NotHoodlum A group of scientists called the @cochranecollab looked at 14 studies of #Ivermectin and found…

@MolaRamLinux @MagaPhoenix73 @Chuckychuckles1 @TomDoubting @WeisbergSarah @cbeckj @PlatoonOps @Great2BGenZ @DuaneL51 @KarmaKhaos666 @Jeanelynn @Carlinisjesus @KARMA92630394 @Synyster63 @victorriker1 @tHeBohem7 @Flattielover @DigiVorr @Wanderinglord @Bernva

@alexm0719 @tw_gato @TimRunsHisMouth From PubMed Read the "main results" for more. https://t.co/4XcmrC3YjH https://t.co/wWhJ5lg77S