@fleurdotone @pktoutceci_ @xazalbert @MVPolitique @idrissaberkane Sur l'Ivermectine ? Voilà déjà 2 croyances très répandues battues en brèche. Vous pouvez donc identifier ceux qui les défendent comme des sources peu fiables https://t.co/a3oT5O1nyF
@The4ourthBranch @um_felipe @TaurenDruids @TomFitton For posterity: The non-expert paranoid conspiracist was peddling non-peer-reviewed cr*p for ideological reasons. https://t.co/pQ2sypfMYE https://t.co/sLyR0qQWdt https://t.co/9M8djQuvsa https://t.co/zb4
@The4ourthBranch @BioTurboNick I'm saying you're a gullible pseudoskeptic + conspiracist who peddles whatever narrative you find ideologically convenient (ex: ivm, lab leak conspiracism) https://t.co/xBZStjBfpJ https://t.co/sLyR0qQWdt https://t.co/9M8djQ
@nowwhatsthat @StatisticsBC @AB_MD_WarRoom NIH: you will die. Also NOPE https://t.co/qhOMLzvULE Most damning: Cochrane study: NOPE https://t.co/AN6FViuyS5 So 99% of world scientists and health orgs said nope. There is no other side. Just flat earthers
@Noncoerciverea1 @BretWeinstein So Cochrane is wrong? Serious question. https://t.co/YRdD68i0jO
RT @JennyPickles1: @LykDj @smartwookiee @mschade72 @Ghostwalkes @RobAussie1 They just keep on coming … June 2022 … “We found no evidence to…
@LykDj @smartwookiee @mschade72 @Ghostwalkes @RobAussie1 They just keep on coming … June 2022 … “We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection.” https://t.co/PMgHdjepHQ
@Lektronk @DAR1797 @DiedSuddenly_ No, it has not had any success anywhere. Not in India. Not in Africa. There have been about 10 major clinical trials for the drug. It failed all of them. Without exception. Some good meta summaries (ditching the bogus bad
@brsavage11 @heidithewiz @DrJenGunter @bethanyshondark Thanks. Unfortunately none of these are citations. You might as well quote Dr. Seuss. Here's from Cochrane, the gold standard review of trials, as of June 2021. https://t.co/Bd9P9IQzc2
@ovjocm @srut42 @CetiAlphaFumf @realRobPlumber @GidMK For posterity: ivmmeta was a disinformation website meant to fool the credulous, on par with an HIV/AIDS denialist blog. https://t.co/pQ2sypff96 https://t.co/YqxsHgUqbd https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https:
@RogerCl33051189 @sinceronaperfil @KatieDaviscourt oh look, another one https://t.co/JDpXy2DBrn
@eneldiluvio @Massy_444 @AlexBirrell3 @TheoFleury14 I'm sure the dozens of studies just all did it wrong! I just don't think you are willing to accept being wrong. I'm not digging through every study, but it's hard to argue study after study failing to s
@LM_Ginger_Kitty @NovElection2024 What a moron.. Clinical trials have shown that ivermectin did fuck all.. https://t.co/alVWgExUck 2. The vaccine wasn’t untested, it wasn’t fully FDA approved. 3. What deadly effects..?!? Lemme rephrase.. What a fuckin
@dslack_haf @TheoFleury14 https://t.co/17JWLgUdsx Still does noting for Covid
@sailendra76 @dslack_haf @TheoFleury14 https://t.co/17JWLgUdsx Ok, Parasitic worms if you want to be precise. Still does nothing for COVID.
@kylenabecker They will lose. Ivermectin doesn’t work. Studies prove it. https://t.co/rCKS9RzS4o
@denniskaiser4 Bullshit. https://t.co/rCKS9RzS4o
@Razor2413 @Neloangelo314 No, it doesn’t work. https://t.co/rCKS9RzkeQ
@RenzTom No. Current studies show absolutely no evidence Ivermectin works. Even studies by the maker, Merck. https://t.co/rCKS9RzkeQ
@USA__one @akheriaty @AaronSiriSG HCQ was "vilified" simply because it doesn't work. Here are two large reviews discussing all the evidence: https://t.co/ZtFcWDEXw3 And: https://t.co/2tOwT5Oa5f
@ChristopheSage @AlaryPatrick @DavidB2703 @myriampalomba @idrissaberkane Ne vous laissez pas avoir par ceux qui veulent vous manipuler. Si on vous dit qu'un traitement marche, vérifiez. Par exemple sur Cochrane mais je peux vous montrer comment aller voir
@MJPadula @Dobberdude @MartyMakary You're a bit gullible if you believe his claims. That being said: IVT: All the large RTs showed it was useless https://t.co/5z79dprkz9 D: even the authors say it's association, not causation Zinc: Useless https://t.co/
@Antonio41107975 @DWYMissSteal @Humble_Analysis You can actually read about the collection of conclusive trials here: https://t.co/5z79dpInB9 And even the bogus ones are discussed
@Antonio41107975 @DWYMissSteal @Humble_Analysis That's full of falsified studies. Find ONE large RCT that shows it works there. I bet you have a favorite! All real trials show it doesn't work. . A summary https://t.co/5z79dpInB9 A summary https://t.co/
@PatrioticPizzas Randomized clinical trials repeatedly found that ivermectin does not benefit COVID-19 patients. Study with more than 1,300 people infected with the coronavirus, ruled out ivermectin as a useful treatment. https://t.co/sbBLNVRWf5 https://t.
@Eric_Schmitt Let me help a bit! mRNA Vaccines work https://t.co/2H3LI1aEb7 Ivermectin is useless for COVID https://t.co/5z79dpqMJB https://t.co/VayqJrb6Qv Fauci did not profit from mRNA vaccines: https://t.co/sgPe8HaC73 Pregnancy? https://t.co/f3V1YO6
@elberethstar @IRINEU79837274 @RobertodosAnjos @vanessnnavarro Tem mais, especialista! https://t.co/aI00Y2pOor
@JebSprague @WR4NYGov According to the PubMed paper cited, the leading tweet contains nothing accurate. The Mayo Clinic has good info on effective therapies: https://t.co/jO4rU2N7Nn The below PubMed paper shows the ineffectiveness of Ivermectin. http
@Pietertwits @Porcupine666 @harryhol https://t.co/pxB5pbGT1k Jup, meta analyses van cochrane kletsen uit hun nek.
@KimBroadsword @Chicago1Ray https://t.co/CdtZMURZiz Here’s a better study. The one you posted is a meta-analysis of 6 trials, with one being mortality data from Peru (not known for a bastion of clinical studies.)
@KuchaMusora Нет так не понятно все с ним https://t.co/WUVyXYTxb9
RT @MedicalScitech: @Covid19Critical #Ivermectin for preventing and treating #COVID19 https://t.co/Z5PcZYwzUV References to studies includ…
@PaulMaxit Mais qu'est-ce que tu racontes? https://t.co/U8MSN8lMJx L'industrie pharmaceutique n'empêche pas la recherche medicale ... ca coute de l'argent à l'état quand sa population est malade et meurs, personne ne veut ça ...
@SleepySaff @CanadianAthies1 @herosjourney11 @buchanan17 @PrisonPlanet Yes. I think he did a search and assumed anything he found supported Ivermectin. OTOH, Ivsearch for results posted by the lead researcher, Echeverri. He found Ivermectin at best made
@Jeannemarie1309 @LockedFab @raoult_didier VOUS? 🙄 vous adorez accuser les autres, hein? Alors il y a un complot de big pharma pour cacher l'HCQ, la vitamine D, l'Ivermectine... ven dites donc. Voyons ça ensemble. Les études sont publiques https://t.co/a3o
@JR4_Truth @jonathanstea @GidMK Why are you wasting folks' time with unsourced images, likely from the non-peer-reviewed disinformation blog ivmmeta? https://t.co/pQ2sypfMYE https://t.co/sLyR0qQWdt https://t.co/9M8djQuvsa https://t.co/zb4TidgoGz https://
@Shnauser1 @lynn_ohnheiser @BretWeinstein No, you're just wrong. I believe only two meta-studies represent the large RCTs from '22. Both conclude it's useless (as do ALL the large trials individually). You don't have to self medicate to make your politica
@AJ32800278 @jonathanstea Whether or not Ivermectin is effective against covid is an empirical question, which has been thoroughly studied. It doesn't work. I can say that with some confidence, because that's what the best science says. https://t.co/GJq9vK
@shubakka75 @FlatBrainCorp @ESTELLEURBAIN1 @barriere_dr Dans ce cas, allez au bout de la démarche et constatez les effets sur patients : https://t.co/Ffvvkak3yg
@JR4_Truth @ggreenwald ^^^ Non-peer-reviewed disinformation blog. https://t.co/pQ2sypff96 https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/zb4TidfQR1 https://t.co/ty49vjZitF https://t.co/BVQ9FRIATd
@stock_shan "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomized trials." Found a copy of this on antifa group chat. I'm sure all 14 studies were funded by
@insins31544458 @JOANMITCH2013 @tristanwaleckx @nathsapena Moi je me fie à la référence : https://t.co/n0ZSe6dNl5
RT @youwantawar: 41 different Ivermectin study results, assessment: "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ive…
41 different Ivermectin study results, assessment: "Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomized trials." https://t.co/96vDwmOKth
@StephenM Remind Twitter again what you studied at University? It sure wasn't anything that focused on science... https://t.co/aXKlY2cahv
@geffjoldbloom @DonaldJTrumpJr No problem, it's written right here. Additionally, look at the date and read the article i posted if you dare. Most of those early study results were FALSIFIED regardless. https://t.co/Akby8rxeXo https://t.co/iRp9BkMghH
@geffjoldbloom @DonaldJTrumpJr https://t.co/Akby8rPobw No problem, it's written right here. Additionally, look at the date and read the article i posted if you dare. Most of those early study results were FALSIFIED regardless. https://t.co/2nNu3G0ANL
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID‐19 - Popp, M - 2021 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/4g0qtAVH7H
@StrohJulian @lexxxilovexo @philoshua @willsommer You're peddling a disinformation website. https://t.co/pQ2sypfMYE https://t.co/sLyR0qQWdt https://t.co/9M8djQuvsa https://t.co/zb4TidgoGz https://t.co/ty49vjZQjd https://t.co/9zrenbXLYC
@groin_hammer @tristanrajaz @PierreKory Amazing anyone still cites ivmmeta like it's a credible source. It's a disinformation website. https://t.co/pQ2sypff96 https://t.co/sLyR0qQonV https://t.co/9M8djQtXCC https://t.co/zb4TidfQR1 https://t.co/ty49vjZitF
@MonolithicPeak @SJ_23US @trueOntario @BubbleVapor @Alonso4MVP @cougarr84 @colinb099 @ChrisWNunn They're probably the same ones discussed here That's something worthwhile for yiu to check https://t.co/3a3dgOp3eI
RT @MedicalScitech: @Covid19Critical #Ivermectin for preventing and treating #COVID19 https://t.co/Z5PcZYwzUV References to studies includ…
@DomaineValescia @mattletiss7 🤣🤣🤣 Still trying to push for an antiparasitic drug against a virus. Even after a number of studies proved that it doesn't work. https://t.co/tnOnTDTOvp
@EinfachLiebe1 @privacylord @OWalkure Aber Ivermectin habe ich keine verlässlichen Studien gefunden, die über einen Placeboeffekt hinausgehen. https://t.co/CeM0VmtKjJ
RT @dietcheese: @Irish4thewin @FreedomIsWhy @Christina_Wood1 @njp000 @breakfastnick No, it doesn’t. https://t.co/MY9e8Bobpg https://t.co/J…
@fityheav @KevinNimmock The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews the gold standard of meta analysis studies, also found no evidence that Ivermectin works as an anti viral. https://t.co/HSqNoxNwIv
@Robshop64 @CaulfieldTim @clinicaltrialON Would you like work by the experts? https://t.co/QGpBYOiTAQ Or comparison of risks in science-based vs ideology-based responses? https://t.co/Skb3jbOtlj
@yanmartel89 @JamieSale Lol. That paper is currently being investigated because of an expression of concern over the data in a number of the studies used. The Cochrane Collaboration, considered the gold standard in systematic reviews disagrees. https://
@abarcpet @brclothwrites Ummmm… here’s a link too… https://t.co/PurnUMpqlP. This is just one of many studies that disagrees with you. https://t.co/BoBxzPO7uD
@MrGlass61145253 @EvacTony @Dominiquetaegon He tarnished his reputation even further by using vaccine conspiracy theories to promote using invermectin to treat covid as an alternative to vaccines. After clinical trials it has shown no benefit to covid suf
@Pugsley420 @therod1978 @Scott24599866 @Wil_McBrideX @MsBlaireWhite Not sure what good it will do given what you've passed as evidence. The Cochrane Collaboration is recognised for it's high standards https://t.co/wJ7TK289LE
@Sue93518895 @BilsonhBilson @MickJ62295702 @iambackagain21 @OzraeliAvi No, Sue, I'm just not interested in your narrative. I've already looked into ivermectin and concluded that randomised control trials do NOT support its use. It is not a substitute for a
RT @AllyJonsson: There are 31 ongoing trials for Ivermectin to treat Covid. So far the evidence is that it does NOT prevent deaths or worse…
Yes, I'm trolling a... but please don't ask me to write you an Rx for ivermectin. A: I'm an anesthesiologist B: There is little to no evidence of ivermectin's efficacy in preventing or improving outcomes of Covid-19. https://t.co/Bb68JC90Hh
@iambackagain21 @BilsonhBilson @Sue93518895 @OzraeliAvi A better source of credible information, a 2022 review from the Cochrane Institute. "We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection" htt
@Sue93518895 @BilsonhBilson @OzraeliAvi The esteemed and independent Cochrane Institute has concluded in its review; "We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection" https://t.co/7bLgr8fFMs
There are 31 ongoing trials for Ivermectin to treat Covid. So far the evidence is that it does NOT prevent deaths or worsening symptoms from covid. https://t.co/C8xe5eNY1e
@momentpresent21 @richardhetu Vous avez les contrats? Ivermectine ne fonctionne pas: https://t.co/BtzuZ2bxZY Hydroxychloroquine ne fonctionne pas: https://t.co/CWlkiEIWPO
@sevlacc @andrefrankl @ElenaoAline @augustodeAB Opa é ora pesquisar, faço questão então mas vc tem que ler tudinho senhor estudioso https://t.co/3jWnZQNaI6
@Songbir40253612 @Dan85220270 @JennyTa22393082 🍳🧠🤡 The whole world is in the pocket of Big Pharma 🤦♂️🤦♂️ It doesn't work. https://t.co/KzmLIHE4FZ
@LucileFievet @Oliviersanstom Donc un antiviral est universel ? Exceptionnel de dire ça. Sinon, quelles études ? Les sociétés savantes sont unanimes. Aucun effet face au Sars-Cov-2. https://t.co/rCRLwzbHyc
@insins31544458 @MadaJoal J'en dis tout simplement ça👇 https://t.co/0gGovYUOMg
@insins31544458 @FrancisBScience Ça ne marche pas. https://t.co/0gGovYUOMg
@turpinator929 @FranJac1991 @PhillyPharmaBoy @AlastairMcA30 @jakeshieldsajj They point out how said methodology leads to garbage findings, and showed their finds in an their meta-analysis. Not my fault you fell for a garbage source like ivmmeta. Maybe you