@okanogen2022 @luckyburritos @6Hypothetical @Nick__Bryant This might help https://t.co/omeXonqEAq Or even https://t.co/5z79dpInB9

#receipts #earlytreatmentworks but denied by #TheScience #BlueCheckMedicine

@Michelle17Q @Kathlee68669960 @victori_roe13 Here's the most trusted medical non-profit in the world: https://t.co/5z79dpInB9

@alexandrosM @RonJCarson1 Since Hill's analysis 12 negative RCTs with various endpoints have published, including two high-dose ivermectin studies showing no effect on viral load. What will these RCTs will do the the meta-analysis? Cochrane says IVM of lit

RT @Newcli0: コクランもEMAも臨床試験以外では使うなとするイベルメクチンをお勧めしワクチン接種率向上に目もくれない医療ジャーナリスト（）伊藤隼也さん… https://t.co/MfVOkq4z79 https://t.co/Q1DlpuKK4f https:…

@RonJCarson1 @alexandrosM The latest meta-analyses of RCTs show no effect of ivermectin on a number of outcomes, including hospitalization and death. If memory serves, 14% of placebo patients in the TOGETER Trial were hospitalized vs. 12% IVM. No effect.

@TextbookAmI @errolenv That's what I thought initially. SMH. https://t.co/DG54Cxjiya

@trevtrey1 @mmpadellan Yes. And HCQ. Here's are two reviews of all reputable clinical trials to-date: https://t.co/5z79dpInB9 https://t.co/omeXonqEAq

@sammyrejc @Lee_Tennant @ItsJustaRide @phuromnee @Freedom28323857 Let me help. When you ditch the shitty studies, retracted papers, and small sample junk, all you are left with are...clinical trials that clearly show it doesn't work for COVID. At all. Her

@ptcjoneses @SaltaoVladimir @cbeckj @mpc_xetts @JohnRee58027351 @JRoschuk @BradBargle @ryanbeed @JonathanSarfat1 @TakethatCt @real_seeking @OXHarryH1 @msabouri @Dalmane15 @paulwiggins @effink777 @backwoodsohm @villagerssn @tickerguy @Vaxed2DaMax @Tmafkab @

@ptcjoneses @ryanbeed @cbeckj @SaltaoVladimir @real_seeking @villagerssn @TakethatCt @JohnRee58027351 @Vaxed2DaMax @Tmafkab @effink777 @KlaasvanDijk5 @Dalmane15 @KStateTurk @dksdata @gtuckerkellogg @OXHarryH1 @JonathanSarfat1 @mobindondon @TigerlillySusan

@fahypat @SavtaGaby @UFCRAMly @jakeshieldsajj That's typical research caveats. Ten large RCTs this year. It's settled. Here's the cautious Cochrane review of evidence: https://t.co/5z79dpInB9

@vikleroy @AlexSamTG @TatianaVentose Encore ? (visiblement non) https://t.co/KfPOhWHoca

@joshmdecker @DrSusanOliver1 Where is your data it saved millions? All quality research shows the drugs he recommends are ineffective except paxlovid which has a narrow window so requires early testing. https://t.co/xYe0CUMIyP https://t.co/2ylzXU0cRS

@FlugschuleE In meinem Internet kam die Studie 2031 auf ein anderes Ergebnis ... 🧐 https://t.co/RTny2KkIA6

RT @nickmmark: We really don’t need more ivermectin RCTs. Every large RCT was negative I-TECH https://t.co/dtEqV3SiE0 EPIC https://t.co/K5…

@LaineRodolphe @FlorianJ69 @TatianaVentose @NansFLORENS https://t.co/ltUFhvYA30

RT @nickmmark: We really don’t need more ivermectin RCTs. Every large RCT was negative I-TECH https://t.co/dtEqV3SiE0 EPIC https://t.co/K5…

RT @Newcli0: コクランもEMAも臨床試験以外では使うなとするイベルメクチンをお勧めしワクチン接種率向上に目もくれない医療ジャーナリスト（）伊藤隼也さん… https://t.co/MfVOkq4z79 https://t.co/Q1DlpuKK4f https:…

@Diane49713312 @ArtVandalay000 @nprpolitics And those same idiots post bogus and retracted research to convince people to keep paying them for prescriptions. You can read a summary by objective researchers here: https://t.co/omeXonqEAq Or even the very w

RT @nickmmark: We really don’t need more ivermectin RCTs. Every large RCT was negative I-TECH https://t.co/dtEqV3SiE0 EPIC https://t.co/K5…

@VPrasadMDMPH Do you have any response to this prominent physician's comment below? https://t.co/er5Ia4gecz

RT @MDaware: publication dates: I-TECH: February 18, 2022 EPIC: March 4, 2021 IVERCORCOVID: May 5, 2022 TOGETHER: 02 July 2021 Cochrane m…

RT @nickmmark: We really don’t need more ivermectin RCTs. Every large RCT was negative I-TECH https://t.co/dtEqV3SiE0 EPIC https://t.co/K5…

RT @nickmmark: We really don’t need more ivermectin RCTs. Every large RCT was negative I-TECH https://t.co/dtEqV3SiE0 EPIC https://t.co/K5…

RT @MDaware: publication dates: I-TECH: February 18, 2022 EPIC: March 4, 2021 IVERCORCOVID: May 5, 2022 TOGETHER: 02 July 2021 Cochrane m…

RT @nickmmark: We really don’t need more ivermectin RCTs. Every large RCT was negative I-TECH https://t.co/dtEqV3SiE0 EPIC https://t.co/K5…

RT @nickmmark: We really don’t need more ivermectin RCTs. Every large RCT was negative I-TECH https://t.co/dtEqV3SiE0 EPIC https://t.co/K5…

RT @nickmmark: We really don’t need more ivermectin RCTs. Every large RCT was negative I-TECH https://t.co/dtEqV3SiE0 EPIC https://t.co/K5…

publication dates: I-TECH: February 18, 2022 EPIC: March 4, 2021 IVERCORCOVID: May 5, 2022 TOGETHER: 02 July 2021 Cochrane meta-analysis: 21 June 2022 is VP ignorant of the RCT evidence he says we need? or is he feigning ignorance for …reasons? https:/

RT @nickmmark: We really don’t need more ivermectin RCTs. Every large RCT was negative I-TECH https://t.co/dtEqV3SiE0 EPIC https://t.co/K5…

We really don’t need more ivermectin RCTs. Every large RCT was negative I-TECH https://t.co/dtEqV3SiE0 EPIC https://t.co/K5IbMZSLh6 IVERCORCOVID https://t.co/QBkSjGMg1h TOGETHER https://t.co/k6d7Eph8xv A Cochrane meta-analysis was also negative https://t

@rig_s13 @ClaudeSteve6 @lety75014 Tout les autres disent que les effets st inexistant voir dangereux (11 essaies) https://t.co/4VW3EZ2HsY

@applegat14 @RogueTr51010193 @NSWHealth @OdyseeTeam Also for some non biased info collected for your benefit. It’s in plain English and scientific. This is a collection of all trials going and on going and is updated regularly. https://t.co/WbsYKgwVZZ

@48HDpanhead https://t.co/3d52eHmJD1

@SuryaFaridaa @MinnesotaDFL Even Cochrane now: https://t.co/5z79dpInB9

@willywo06261169 @krebiozen @JonathanHannah @LifeAfterWEF @AndrewLazarus4 @Mr_Magoo5 @JuliaHadley15 @whykeepitup @FvckYourFear @SkepticalMutant @The_Seeadler @nyx200 @MsTrixter @FillmoreWhite @AngryFleas @mcfunny @DrGeniusGino @TonyBaduy @dunningsback @Jun

@willywo06261169 @JonathanHannah @LifeAfterWEF @AndrewLazarus4 @Mr_Magoo5 @JuliaHadley15 @whykeepitup @FvckYourFear @SkepticalMutant @The_Seeadler @nyx200 @MsTrixter @FillmoreWhite @AngryFleas @krebiozen @mcfunny @DrGeniusGino @TonyBaduy @dunningsback @Jun

RT @nickmmark: ICU doc here. POTUS has got asymptomatic COVID not parasitic worms. Per a high quality meta-analysis “reliable evidence av…

RT @nickmmark: ICU doc here. POTUS has got asymptomatic COVID not parasitic worms. Per a high quality meta-analysis “reliable evidence av…

RT @nickmmark: ICU doc here. POTUS has got asymptomatic COVID not parasitic worms. Per a high quality meta-analysis “reliable evidence av…

RT @nickmmark: ICU doc here. POTUS has got asymptomatic COVID not parasitic worms. Per a high quality meta-analysis “reliable evidence av…

RT @nickmmark: ICU doc here. POTUS has got asymptomatic COVID not parasitic worms. Per a high quality meta-analysis “reliable evidence av…

My family are laughing at you. Different age groups and comorbidities. All received the same fda approved Ivermectin with other fda approved medicines. Symptoms didn't get worse and no hospitalization Stay away from covid cult doctors like you

ICU doc here. POTUS has got asymptomatic COVID not parasitic worms. Per a high quality meta-analysis “reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19” https://t.co/tt9VAz6A7q

@Ghost_ProtocolV @cathynhouston @FoInsight @DashDobrofsky @RepMTG https://t.co/SPghqLB37y

This case study was done prior to the uproar of Ivermectin. Jul 28 2021 Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 case study https://t.co/ur5f4cYpTM

@fcktyranny2 @alienmotives At least 12 quality, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled studies -- 9 since the beginning of this year -- indicate ivermectin is devoid of meaningful activity against COVID. Here are just two of many meta-analyses of RCTs

@DD59170 @HomoSap60422481 @qo_ideme6 En effet mieux vaut s'informer des des revues scientifiques. Lesquelles, par exemple ? La Cochrane n'est pas de cet avis. https://t.co/PZHDWu2PWe

RT @DrSergioRalon: @molinaret Cochrane presenta la mejor evidencia basada en en meta análisis. Pueden pasar a leer Se los dejo en españo…

@molinaret Cochrane presenta la mejor evidencia basada en en meta análisis. Pueden pasar a leer Se los dejo en español. https://t.co/Kw6GPY7qhZ

@macmillan_off @CathyLabasque @GuillaumeBarucq Oh que oui...https://t.co/nYy1rELIhy

@rn_abrahamsen @Silje_Schevig @CiViX https://t.co/UrwQAfpxqU

@rn_abrahamsen @Silje_Schevig @CiViX Det har vært forsket på ivemektin siden tidlig i 2020, men ingen studier av kvalitet viser noe resultat av preparatet mot Covid-19. https://t.co/ynqeV9ZxFB

@WotsOnInfo Yet a meta analysis by the independent Cochrane Institute says differently. "We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection" Of course McCullough's income is dependent on his nar

@highbrow_nobrow @TheWarMonitor https://t.co/41Hesfguyd study’s still ongoing as results have varied widely. Trust the science, right?

@BrandonMJ514 @SamRoberge08 @ArponBasu Reality: of trials that had any scientific integrity and weren’t just made up, no evidence for any benefit. https://t.co/3ovNYzKcLE

@currie27 @MGeschwind @ArponBasu It is great for your crusted scabies! But there is zero evidence it does anything for COVID. https://t.co/3ovNYzKcLE

@TheBethofDeath @mevans4900 @Midian85 @verdugo_don @amegaro90 @SethDillon @POTUS https://t.co/S0RYnKgbRp

RT @swedishchf: @covidscam2 @the_ason @troydee @JestrBob @provaxtexan @handmadekathy @doritmi @michellespj @teaze_r @RandomKiwiUS @MsTrixte…

RT @swedishchf: @covidscam2 @the_ason @troydee @JestrBob @provaxtexan @handmadekathy @doritmi @michellespj @teaze_r @RandomKiwiUS @MsTrixte…

@covidscam2 @the_ason @troydee @JestrBob @provaxtexan @handmadekathy @doritmi @michellespj @teaze_r @RandomKiwiUS @MsTrixter @goodlobster1 @crabb_vicki @AndrewLazarus4 @TheFrankmanMN @flitesurgn @Patriot4517 @avocato_bob @kevinault @DrFluffyPants3 @Strange

@dperetti @f_philippot @HAS_sante https://t.co/nYy1rELIhy

@molsjames @JReinerMD @PeterHotez @EricTopol @JonathanSarfat1 @TigerlillySusan In this conversation the data shows ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, etc. https://t.co/bQjXVirVUm https:/

@nickmmark @BillyCarruther3 @mark_melbin @SkyNewsAust @Leo_Puglisi6 @jimmy_dore @mtaibbi @ggreenwald @joerogan @maddow For Dore's gullible fans: Ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamet

@uPdy5n4VyG60EMv @S5sX2LyITzsu7tk Cochrane Reviewの結論は We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection. Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19 https://t.co/MObhidYnU2

@GRosethefirst @allangmiller1 @microbiomeandme @sebpowell @apsmunro 2 results weren't actually RCTs. In any event, these people did it much better than I could ever do. Disclaimer: I'm a very out-of practice biochemist, and don't work in the field. Doesn't

@Leviathan_100 @mulletron60 @The_Ouroboros__ @Therappinghand @Yarabibi123 @NicolaSims1966 @TheFreds Tess Lawrie 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Shame her meta was based on fraudulent data. Let’s try something unbiased https:

@LionDuNet https://t.co/FJMBWqHZHv Très efficace en effet ! T'as raté médecine et c'est ta façon de corriger le tir ? C'est minable, assume juste que tu es lissencéphale et incapable de mener un raisonnement accessible à un chimpanzé 😬

@backwoodsohm @ryanbeed @SaltaoVladimir @cbeckj @mpc_xetts @JohnRee58027351 @TakethatCt @tickerguy @ptcjoneses @effink777 @villagerssn @real_seeking @Vaxed2DaMax @Tmafkab @KlaasvanDijk5 @Dalmane15 @KStateTurk @dksdata @gtuckerkellogg @OXHarryH1 @JonathanSa

@ConstantRebel55 @molsjames @JReinerMD @PeterHotez @EricTopol Yup. Ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. https://t.co/bQjXVirVUm https://t.co/cBbvpvnGGO [https://t.co/S

@Mr_NoTyrants @RupertPupkin895 @PhillyPharmaBoy @real_seeking @DocDeezWhat @max____headroom @InRainbows182 @curmudgeon_red @SomeSis1 @Resistenzanow @cryptofailsafe @pelleggi2 @Trumpbangskids there are many studies, at best conflicting, the top link conclud

@CedricSacced @LapiGreg @BigSuis @worldfflyer @MMeBlackSheep Donc je t'en prie, envoie cette étude. Je n'ai pas lu ça étrangement... https://t.co/PZHDWu2PWe

@ptcjoneses @ryanbeed @cbeckj @SaltaoVladimir @real_seeking @villagerssn @TakethatCt @JohnRee58027351 @Vaxed2DaMax @Tmafkab @effink777 @KlaasvanDijk5 @Dalmane15 @KStateTurk @dksdata @gtuckerkellogg @OXHarryH1 @JonathanSarfat1 @mobindondon @verap1 @Tigerlil

@insins31544458 @JeanLo17459216 @clement_helart @HoSinopeus @ChrisCottonStat ? Mais vous balancez un blog pourri sans preuve qui demande de l'argent pour des fausses victimes... On vous demande de la rigueur, des études. Aucune aujourd'hui ne montre quoi q

@tmoneybrown @dafwoyz @nickmmark @jimmy_dore Cochrane is the gold standard for medicine. Here's what they have to say. https://t.co/NEE4DGiHyf

@realnikohouse @nickmmark @jimmy_dore How is it debunked? https://t.co/NEE4DGiHyf

@covideuskal Yo no me creería todo lo que se escribe por ahí. No entraré en detalles pero, hasta donde yo sé, no hay evidencia científica de que la ivermectina tenga ningún efecto en el tratamiento de pacientes COVID. https://t.co/odvSaUHTVg

@RobertFritzenk1 @TaoOfCats @real_seeking @NPR Try a credible source. Ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. https://t.co/bQjXVirVUm https://t.co/cBbvpvnGGO [https://t.c

@JosephLemire198 @nadineridorossi @RenaudClaudia @steeeve27 Y'a d'autres études qui disent le contraire aussi mais tu as déjà démontré ta difficulté à comprendre un article scientifique alors je t'envoie un petit lien facile à comprendre. https://t.co/m7Ft

@USMCC3maw @Hashgraphian @jmray60 I'm quite aware. I've done research on the matter. The fact is that MOST people who got Covid didn't die whether they took Ivermectin or not. Stories are shit compared to actual scientific data. https://t.co/AN5eBF8pzE

@bestbadideas @ctvwinnipeg The Lancet? Same Lancet that had to retract a bogus hydroxychloroquine article? They're part of the problem. But this isn't about Ivermectin. It's about freedom of physician/patient relationship. https://t.co/wqyXR4gHWl

@catlyn777 @RussianDisinf0 @WSJ I hate Trump too dude, but even a broken clock is right twice day. Ivermectin was clearly at least somewhat effective at treating Covid https://t.co/NfLbxGAqJM

@NeilochGaming @TheRadicalProle @RageMichelle @Walgreens Oh look, Ivermectin helped ease symptoms. What now? 🙄 https://t.co/E8LOlBzlJH

@CulinaryOasis79 @real_seeking @SJ_18757 @SEH20203 @MollyBoHa @juliastmi Press pieces aren't evidence, troll. 🙂 Ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, etc. https://t.co/bQjXVirVUm https://t

@real_seeking @mrudolph22 @ImplicitNorm @RpsAgainstTrump False. The data shows ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, dexamethasone, etc. https://t.co/bQjXVirVUm https://t.co/cBbvpvnGGO [ht

@Ruggs4Liberty @billy915 @SallyMayweather Well here's the actual paper on the subject and the 41 studies they did. They seem to have reached a different conclusion https://t.co/Sx7PBFeOTd

@Cetotherium @PettDanFTW @flockofwords @sharanvkaur Here's the education you lack, Dan — https://t.co/o9SdPJs7L2 https://t.co/0lol0HGuGG

@insins31544458 @AnotherGenro @Viky83_06 @lapin47 @Teq04780157 @nicolasberrod https://t.co/C8t2qM5I31

@pete_artist @AnnastaciaMP @TheEkka @qldhealth @YvetteDAth because neither of those work unless you have scabies or Plasmodium vivax (as far as i know P. falciparum is mostly resistant?) or Lupus … a lot of things really, but not COVID https://t.co/1tmHI

@mtntallpaul @JoshW65280673 @BingoMontoya @BlueLinePhilly @MurrayChadwick2 @Briansa79884138 @lukebroadwater @alanfeuer Scabies, head lice, etc. are not SARS-CoV-2. Ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlik

@debbie03700 @Rach050776 @Taniabanks24 @NSWHealth Utter nonsense, there was zero data when people first wanted to use it, and no collective "they" who colluded to "design their studies to fail". Subsequently it was proven not to be an effective treatment

@debbie03700 @Rach050776 @Taniabanks24 @NSWHealth I know your sources, and they are not scientific. This is the gold standard for determining drug effectiveness in medical practice 👇 There is nothing hidden here. "No evidence is available on ivermectin to

@real_seeking @ryanbeed @TakethatCt @ptcjoneses @OXHarryH1 @SaltaoVladimir @JohnRee58027351 @Vaxed2DaMax @JonathanSarfat1 @Dalmane15 @mobindondon @StevenDaw5 @effink777 @verap1 @KStateTurk @TigerlillySusan @villagerssn @notagr0wer @TrevorHifi @tamlarge @Di

@real_seeking @ryanbeed @ptcjoneses @OXHarryH1 @TakethatCt @SaltaoVladimir @JohnRee58027351 @Vaxed2DaMax @JonathanSarfat1 @Dalmane15 @mobindondon @StevenDaw5 @effink777 @verap1 @KStateTurk @TigerlillySusan @villagerssn @notagr0wer @TrevorHifi @tamlarge @Di

RT @AtomsksSanakan: @greenberg_avi @JoseGonzalesZa1 @sTeamTraen @PierreKory Re: "is there any chance that you could please link to (or tell…

RT @AtomsksSanakan: @real_seeking @FillmoreWhite @opedaily @plenalibertad2 @Coyotl2021 @more_unicorns_g The burden of evidence is on you si…

@real_seeking @FillmoreWhite @opedaily @plenalibertad2 @Coyotl2021 @more_unicorns_g The burden of evidence is on you since ivermectin produces results consistent with a drug that does not work for SARS-CoV-2, unlike vaccines, etc. https://t.co/bQjXViJwLU

@melusinefmx7390 @AB32964541 @C27813910 https://t.co/qcD2VMqj9j https://t.co/H2alUbi6J1 https://t.co/EEo9DYWZDS Quelques petits exemples sur le nombre énorme de sources qui montrent que l'ivermectine ne sert à rien. Déconseillé par l'OMS et l'EMA et il fau

@AprilHunter @Cccsjb @RWNJ_ Interesting. It's one study but it does draw different conclusions. This one from the related studies links was not so optimistic. https://t.co/Tn4zBv1d60