@HabilKantur @HHjelte @r_hellqvist Ivmmeta's garbage analysis is not peer-reviewed. https://t.co/zaebDb8S5n https://t.co/sLyR0qQWdt https://t.co/9M8djQuvsa https://t.co/zb4TidgoGz https://t.co/ty49vjZQjd https://t.co/BztlEe5N0f
RT @Yeshua88992: Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte, mostrando que o índice de mortes caiu muito pós iv…
RT @Yeshua88992: Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte, mostrando que o índice de mortes caiu muito pós iv…
RT @Yeshua88992: Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte, mostrando que o índice de mortes caiu muito pós iv…
RT @Yeshua88992: Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte, mostrando que o índice de mortes caiu muito pós iv…
RT @Yeshua88992: Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte, mostrando que o índice de mortes caiu muito pós iv…
RT @Yeshua88992: Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte, mostrando que o índice de mortes caiu muito pós iv…
RT @Yeshua88992: Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte, mostrando que o índice de mortes caiu muito pós iv…
RT @Yeshua88992: Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte, mostrando que o índice de mortes caiu muito pós iv…
RT @Yeshua88992: Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte, mostrando que o índice de mortes caiu muito pós iv…
RT @Yeshua88992: Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte, mostrando que o índice de mortes caiu muito pós iv…
Fonte da maior referência médica do mundo, que o Dr. Fauci fazia parte, mostrando que o índice de mortes caiu muito pós iverm, os dados só vão até 2021, mas o artigo é atualizado https://t.co/GxreaLRpHS https://t.co/RxpH93jORi https://t.co/h4yeab5WQ5
@Compartetuopini @realCarola2Hope Irrespeto opiniones, la ciencia claramente ya dijo que no. Tomar o no tomarla la misma vaina da, t curabas o morías por obra y gracia de tu sistema inmune. https://t.co/LEBLujhPMY
@insins31544458 @LematttLeguik @EricArchambau18 @EricArchambaul7 Pour info... Tu n'as rien trouvé en fait et tu ne maîtrise pas dutout le sujet... https://t.co/J7wXvMDMCd
@veen_els @Het_OM Nouja er is geen enkele reden om aan te nemen dat ivermectine effectief is voor covid: https://t.co/tjwo90Vtzm Als je iemand ivermectine gaat geven voor nierbekkenontsteking kan je ook een uitnodiging vh tuchtcollege verwachten want je b
@PierreKory https://t.co/pPhg5eG6v1 Lots of people in have been Using it- and dying and its not currently helping there by the looks https://t.co/ffdqJGkZJk A lot of recent studies were shown to be of poor design or worse fraudulent: Retracted https://t.c
@chrismiller88 @alissaevelynn @acnewsitics Here is Cochrane, which takes all the studies & puts them together, & comes to a conclusion based on quality of studies: https://t.co/bSFIuxdY3Y
@TehCheezer @leaderpost Is this what you thing a peer reviewed study is? An Abstract? It's a paragraph. Here: https://t.co/7l7Lpegkwt https://t.co/woX1kJPn9a https://t.co/qLxwsxqlkl This is just the first 3 peer reviewed papers from google scholar when
@SusanneWiegand @DrScheuch @AndereMeinung55 Cochrane ist eindeutig bei dem Zeugs https://t.co/RZOlJ1LBum
@Heritage Maybe you should have included these peer reviewed papers, which all find that Ivermectin has no effect against covid? https://t.co/sUyaT659dr https://t.co/Pmlcv7uE1G https://t.co/2xXVTMhkQd https://t.co/Fu8nTVaK8w https://t.co/SvYgCrgM84 htt
@Heritage They include the Chowdhury study which has an invalid comparison group, as detailed in the cochrane review https://t.co/A6QUgyoMdb
@Irenedanj @landofhop Les études semblent pourtant indiquer que l’ivermectin n’a pas vraiment d’effet sur le Covid : https://t.co/BjwOdUuHby
@jathorpmfm There’s no evidence that ivermectin is beneficial for COVID-19. https://t.co/FQqbwQS78e
Nope. https://t.co/DTh4VF1CRB
@nadel_0v @BgmLudwig @mariodujakovic Aber falls du das nun Promoten möchtest bei den üblichen Verdächtigen. Hier wäre der (deutschsprachige) Link: #ivermectin https://t.co/zPbWO5XmYs
Cochrane (which is top of the heap ask any Clinician!) Systematic Review & Meta Analysis, alas, says no. https://t.co/DTh4VF1CRB Virology Journal Sys Rev & Meta analysis says no https://t.co/F2Qnu9QCNE BMC Infect. Dis Sys Rev & Meta Analysis
Cochrane (which is top of the heap ask any Clinician!) Systematic Review & Meta Analysis, alas, says no. https://t.co/DTh4VF1CRB Virology Journal Sys Rev & Meta analysis says no https://t.co/F2Qnu9QCNE BMC Infect. Dis Sys Rev & Meta Analysis
@he99845 @dr_jon_l Cochrane (which is top of the heap ask any Clinician!) Systematic Review & Meta Analysis, alas, says no. https://t.co/DTh4VF1CRB Virology Journal Sys Rev & Meta analysis says no https://t.co/F2Qnu9QCNE BMC Infect. Dis Sys Rev &
@Andreaf_ondo @luisnube @MariolySosaP Me leí todo el post del 2021 y en ningún lado se aseveró que la ivermentira fue eficaz para reducir mortandad o agravamiento por covid. Te recomiendo q leas antes de compartir algo. Ahora lee este estudio del 2024... S
@EMR_ICMS @world_of_pies @Censored4sure Plenty of trials have been done on IVM. Sadly (but not surprisingly) it is not the miracle cure we all wanted it to be. Here is the most recent cochrane review https://t.co/eUGwhvByKF
Why do conspiracists want to take ivermectin for a virus that, according to them, doesn’t exist?! Btw ivermectin has no impact on coronavirus infection, which is a real virus that killed millions of people worldwide….. https://t.co/s1V9CQYSSt
@JDickerson92890 @awens_childe @Karen86105874 @ZachWahls @TedMchugh13 Nope just going back in my replies to you. https://t.co/vJfD4LTw5y
@JDickerson92890 @awens_childe @Karen86105874 @ZachWahls @TedMchugh13 It's always been safe it's just intended for something else. https://t.co/qqfYyDJMx4 https://t.co/euGDn1I6lN https://t.co/gGWBP8ugoM https://t.co/wL8vla0SAS https://t.co/zdn7yI4jnL
@insins31544458 @MorenoStphane1 @manuelpourtois @PaulNeau Le job a été fait par des experts et leurs conclusions sont claires. On ne refera pas le travail ici. https://t.co/HoRuq8ghQE
@MorenoStphane1 @insins31544458 @manuelpourtois @PaulNeau Je ne vous parle d'aucune étude mais de la méta analyse Cochrane https://t.co/HoRuq8ghQE
Bulshit! Now tell us how many thousands studies say exactly the opposite. https://t.co/uYll94RCGe
@ReggiePaw @jsm2334 @CraigKellyPHON @GidMK That ivermecta aggregation site is a joke. Every early study that was really small or fraudulent is listed while none of the large ones are included (a clue!). GidMK's summaries are great and so is this: https://t
@NMarbletoe @maynejt @VigilantFox Aw, poor guy. Did you just realize the mistake you made and got so embarrassed you blocked me? The "low certainty" was for A DIFFERENT STUDY IT WAS REFERENCING. CITATION 11. Holy Shit 😂😂😂 https://t.co/xuFtnYZ769
"... doesn't look promising..." IF so, WHAT IS THE PROBLEM with people using it ? For any reason... - Sit back and watch. - the patients will pay the research as they use it - and FAIL..? - Or worse, show it IS of benefit...?
@VincetOmniaDeo Nope. Because you can't interpret studies, you don't spot the weaknesses in the claims that are not supported by data. Read more. https://t.co/cpINwkrsFx
@VincetOmniaDeo Keep reading. 1. https://t.co/mBOmeRapqE 2. https://t.co/mDkMrR7u21 3. https://t.co/9y7elvLC5p
@VigilantFox Tis is misinformation. It was all based on the best science available. Masks https://t.co/xZ8rSp5Oqi and other mitigation measures saved lives https://t.co/AjHq3IYicj and ivermectin is still being researched but it doesn't look promising https
@NMarbletoe @dclynch07 @akafacehots The 1st study that came up. "Ivermectin compared to placebo or usual care may make little or no difference to improving patients' condition 28 days after treatment (1 study, 73 people) or to length of hospital stay (1 s
@PierreKory Ivermectin is not effective https://t.co/Xl8g7P3jc1
@stkirsch Show me evidence that it worked. My link is https://t.co/KyFglY1ClV
@Cristia83422806 @taoquei1 https://t.co/nqyFj5VR8A Não encontramos evidências para apoiar o uso de ivermectina no tratamento da COVID-19 ou na prevenção da infecção pelo SARS-CoV-2. A base de evidências melhorou ligeiramente nesta atualização, mas ainda é
@insins31544458 @brienico @ZytoCher @BruHugues @Inconnukiki2000 @OlivierAgos @TgdxbBru @Jeannemarie1309 @abraxas1518 @fr_russie 🙄🙄🙄 Allez pour te faire plaisir : il y a des preuves de l'efficacité de l'ivermectine qui vont de très faible a forte. Voilà Con
@The12thChakra @OneBadDude_ @krassenstein Hahaha That’s a conspiracy website not a medical one. It shows no peer reviewed studies Here is the Cochrane report which takes all studies on ivermectin & gives a conclusion. This is a medical site not one
@VigilantFox Safety of ivermectin or how it has fared in other diseases is irrelevant. So far ivermectin does not seem to be effective against COVID-19. https://t.co/gaKnfSvWf2
@VickiCoyle10019 The old Cochrane study which clearly states: "Our confidence in the evidence is very low because we could only include 14 studies with few participants and few events, such as deaths or need for ventilation." https://t.co/TxZmtNMYYV
@freemanhunt Cochrane Review is still waiting on the results of 31 studies. Will those studies change anything? I don't know. But I'll reserve my opinion until the studies are concluded. https://t.co/vXyE3RhvPb
@EricArchambaul7 Vraiment un 🤡 et surtout un danger ce @EricArchambaul7 . Un danger pour les gens influençables! https://t.co/WHWhm5hNze https://t.co/RlGnsHY2kf https://t.co/MjS38vfX7N https://t.co/lOt7pWX6eT https://t.co/6yKCpk6mUd
RT @UroFuchs1: @GeraldNeuwirth So eine klitzekleine, in einem obskuren Journal publizierte Studie sticht natürlich diesen Cochrane-Review a…
@PabloFase2 @soyjavijavi @manuelhborbolla @PPmerino @Claudiashein Las revisiones sistemáticas son la mejor evidencia, no inventes. Y me encantan los factores de impacto de tus citas, así como las fechas. Date: https://t.co/i8zIJmiPfx https://t.co/ffkpJVv
RT @UroFuchs1: @GeraldNeuwirth So eine klitzekleine, in einem obskuren Journal publizierte Studie sticht natürlich diesen Cochrane-Review a…
RT @UroFuchs1: @GeraldNeuwirth So eine klitzekleine, in einem obskuren Journal publizierte Studie sticht natürlich diesen Cochrane-Review a…
RT @UroFuchs1: @GeraldNeuwirth So eine klitzekleine, in einem obskuren Journal publizierte Studie sticht natürlich diesen Cochrane-Review a…
RT @UroFuchs1: @GeraldNeuwirth So eine klitzekleine, in einem obskuren Journal publizierte Studie sticht natürlich diesen Cochrane-Review a…
RT @UroFuchs1: @GeraldNeuwirth So eine klitzekleine, in einem obskuren Journal publizierte Studie sticht natürlich diesen Cochrane-Review a…
@GeraldNeuwirth So eine klitzekleine, in einem obskuren Journal publizierte Studie sticht natürlich diesen Cochrane-Review aus, der zu dem Schluss kommt, dass Ivermectin bei Covid keine Wirksamkeit hat. Cherrypicking zeigt nur, wie ignorant man ist. http
@insins31544458 @fanfouneletos @Etienne_Chouard Celui-ci. Vous savez, j'aurais préféré qu'on trouve un moyen simple et rapide de sauver tout le monde. https://t.co/jrcs4oF3ub
@sudokuvariante Il y a un gouffre entre les données in vitro et in vivo. Tout le monde espère une molécule antivirale efficace. https://t.co/KgejmBYqad
@Conservati22375 @john_linnus @stuartbuck1 @martyrmade https://t.co/t25ufQ6dTv Cochrane is a much better source
@jennawrites @PeterHotez @ChrisCuomo There are dozen *large* RCTs (your example isn't one) globally that all show ivt is useless for COVID. Every single one has the same finding. Without exception. And the Meta studies back this up. Even the manufacturer's
RT @eddydeds: @jennawrites @PeterHotez @ChrisCuomo Possibly the gold standard https://t.co/KyFglY1ClV We found no evidence to support the u…
@GuntherEagleman For patients with worms! https://t.co/JyeK5PTVoF
@Existence_138 @Mr_M024 @DorlandRon @TrumpDailyPosts NO FUCKING EVIDENCE
@Existence_138 @Mr_M024 @DorlandRon @TrumpDailyPosts 2024 “we found no evidence…. should be used to treat Covid” https://t.co/QffUNH3Y9K
RT @eddydeds: @jennawrites @PeterHotez @ChrisCuomo Possibly the gold standard https://t.co/KyFglY1ClV We found no evidence to support the u…
@GaryinCHSv2 @Heritage That’s a lie, and even so, there is also no evidence at all to support the use of ivermectin as a prophylactic against covid. Absolutely none. https://t.co/BSh2LK3kmM
RT @eddydeds: @jennawrites @PeterHotez @ChrisCuomo Possibly the gold standard https://t.co/KyFglY1ClV We found no evidence to support the u…
RT @eddydeds: @jennawrites @PeterHotez @ChrisCuomo Possibly the gold standard https://t.co/KyFglY1ClV We found no evidence to support the u…
RT @eddydeds: @jennawrites @PeterHotez @ChrisCuomo Possibly the gold standard https://t.co/KyFglY1ClV We found no evidence to support the u…
RT @eddydeds: @jennawrites @PeterHotez @ChrisCuomo Possibly the gold standard https://t.co/KyFglY1ClV We found no evidence to support the u…
@FiveTimesAugust @ChrisCuomo "We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection..." https://t.co/zQEkGlpkKU
@JrmeBrwnCt @jlrichard @XavierBazin2 Vous en êtes encore là ? La vache ! On sait que tout cela ne marche pas. https://t.co/HcyCJ65iFs https://t.co/CxO9CoZToL
@jennawrites @PeterHotez @ChrisCuomo Possibly the gold standard https://t.co/KyFglY1ClV We found no evidence to support the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection
@leslibless Sorry - NO EVIDENCE THAT IVERMECTIN OR HCQ WORKED -- @ProudArmyBrat clueless -- 14 ivermectin studies SHOWED NO EVIDENCE OF EFFECTIVENESS: https://t.co/rnPK3vC7gn
@mahou_tse_tung @Estherperalfos @Beatrizrod84912 @FLMIRONES En castellano para que no le dé miedo y lo entienda: https://t.co/XVPUqpyOmA
@AdrianaZerCDMX @Garcimonero @Claudiashein La verdad es que eres un pobre pendejo que vive en un rancho. La hipermentina es en Todo el MUNDO usada para el tratamiento del "COVID" que fue desarrollado por DARPA en China. Además que mintieron sobre ella http
@SpaceFromGreece @pavpol2222 Όταν ανεβάζεις κάποιο «επιστημονικό άρθρο» για τον COVID19 να ελέγχεις την αξιοπιστία της πηγής. Αυτό που έδειξες είναι μια μπουρδα. Εγώ από την άλλη θα σου δείξω το συμπέρασμα του μεγαλύτερου οργανισμού ανασκόπησης ιατρικών δε
@FarSight3 @johannes_rauch @WolfgangMueckst Es gibt keinen Nachweis dafür du Schwurblertrottel https://t.co/txB4u6VMB8
@osocialoficial https://t.co/yxu2ZnMK7L a invermectina teve o mesmo efeito do placebo nos estudos, e a MAIORIA dos estudos que apontavam eficacia, foram desconsiderados pq a metodologia e amostragem eram incoerentes ou inconsistentes. Tu sabe identificar i
@Luchevito2022 Por favor, publica lo que haz leído porque no he encontrado nada de eso, más bien leí este que data de hace sólo 2 meses atrás 👇🏻 https://t.co/aS4hYQeI19
@GuntherEagleman Ivermectin & vaccines were both unknown for covid at the beginning. Vaccines were studied much more so have much better evidence base. Why do anti-vaxers love Ivermectin so much? Evidence base isn't great. Cochrane Library, THE best so
@1Diligent1 @Chicken_Bawker @TrumpDailyPosts Quoting years old discredited information doesn’t help your inaccurate assessment. Try getting up to date. https://t.co/ocHcI8lfJU