The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Minimally invasive treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a network meta‐analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013656.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Juan Va Franco, Jae Hung Jung, Mari Imamura, Michael Borofsky, Muhammad Imran Omar, Camila Micaela Escobar Liquitay, Shamar Young, Jafar Golzarian, Areti Angeliki Veroniki, Luis Garegnani, Philipp Dahm |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
Argentina | 2 | 15% |
United States | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 120 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
Other | 9 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
Unspecified | 7 | 6% |
Researcher | 7 | 6% |
Other | 21 | 18% |
Unknown | 53 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 24% |
Unspecified | 7 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
Other | 13 | 11% |
Unknown | 60 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,451,643
of 26,338,415 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,841
of 13,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,770
of 451,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#68
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,338,415 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.