↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Timing of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) in cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Timing of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) in cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013488.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christabella Ng, Giles Major, Alan R Smyth

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Psychology 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2021.
All research outputs
#12,359,642
of 18,800,073 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,261
of 11,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,836
of 273,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,800,073 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,862 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.