↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hydromorphone for cancer pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
18 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Hydromorphone for cancer pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011108.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yan Li, Jun Ma, Guijun Lu, Zhi Dou, Roger Knaggs, Jun Xia, Sai Zhao, Sitong Dong, Liqiang Yang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Other 4 6%
Researcher 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 30 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 11 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 35 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,371,638
of 22,899,952 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,972
of 12,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,985
of 429,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#83
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,899,952 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.