The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Hydromorphone for cancer pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011108.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yan Li, Jun Ma, Guijun Lu, Zhi Dou, Roger Knaggs, Jun Xia, Sai Zhao, Sitong Dong, Liqiang Yang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 21% |
| Italy | 2 | 11% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 137 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 6% |
| Researcher | 6 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 84 | 61% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | <1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 92 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,633,733
of 26,784,510 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,069
of 13,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,426
of 444,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#76
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,784,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.