↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hydromorphone for cancer pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Hydromorphone for cancer pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011108.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yan Li, Jun Ma, Guijun Lu, Zhi Dou, Roger Knaggs, Jun Xia, Sai Zhao, Sitong Dong, Liqiang Yang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 15%
Other 2 15%
Student > Master 1 8%
Librarian 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Unknown 7 54%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,623,640
of 19,019,810 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,154
of 11,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,844
of 329,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,019,810 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.