The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Treatment for Charcot‐Marie‐Tooth disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006052.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Young, Peter De Jonghe, Florian Stögbauer, Trude Butterfass‐Bahloul |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 245 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 47 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 10% |
| Researcher | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 54 | 22% |
| Unknown | 56 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 5% |
| Psychology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 38 | 15% |
| Unknown | 63 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2015.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,667
of 168,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#57
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.