↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Continuous versus bolus intermittent intragastric tube feeding for preterm and low birth weight infants with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Continuous versus bolus intermittent intragastric tube feeding for preterm and low birth weight infants with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009719.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robyn Richards, Jann P Foster, Kim Psaila

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 135 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 51 38%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Researcher 7 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 4%
Other 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 49 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 53 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 52 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2021.
All research outputs
#5,985,266
of 23,133,982 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,764
of 12,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,256
of 430,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#117
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,133,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.