↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Topical preparations for preventing stretch marks in pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
26 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
Title
Topical preparations for preventing stretch marks in pregnancy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000066.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miriam Brennan, Gavin Young, Declan Devane

Abstract

Striae gravidarum (stretch marks developing during pregnancy) occur in 50% to 90% of women. They appear as red or purple lines or streaks that fade slowly to leave pale lines or marks on the skin. The abdomen, breasts and thighs are commonly affected. The exact cause of stretch marks is unclear and no preparation has yet been shown to be effective in preventing the development of stretch marks. They are a source of significant anxiety for women, impacting on their quality of life.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 156 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Researcher 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Other 8 5%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 39 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 35%
Psychology 15 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 41 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2021.
All research outputs
#599,840
of 22,487,039 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,213
of 12,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,337
of 176,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,487,039 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.