↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chronic non‐invasive ventilation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
21 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
Title
Chronic non‐invasive ventilation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002878.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim Raveling, Judith Vonk, Fransien M Struik, Roger Goldstein, Huib Am Kerstjens, Peter J Wijkstra, Marieke L Duiverman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 168 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Student > Master 15 9%
Unspecified 12 7%
Researcher 9 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 5%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 85 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 11%
Unspecified 10 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 89 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,370,587
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,909
of 11,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,753
of 437,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.